0

我试图在 linq to Sql 中使用聚合方法,但看起来它不受支持。

LibrarySystemDataContext ctx = new LibrarySystemDataContext();

var query = ctx.Books
  .Select(x => new
      {
        BookID = x.BookID,
          BookName = x.Title,
          Authors = x.AuthorBooks.Select(a => a.Author)
          .Aggregate(new StringBuilder(), (sb, r) => sb.Append(r.FirstName + " " + r.LastName +"& "), sb => sb.ToString())
          });

要使用 Aggregate,我立即将书籍转换为 IEnumerable,如下所示:

var query = ctx.Books.AsEnumerable()
  .Select(x => new
      {
        BookID = x.BookID,
          BookName = x.Title,
          Authors = x.AuthorBooks.Select(a => a.Author)
          .Aggregate(new StringBuilder(), (sb, r) => sb.Append(r.FirstName + " " + r.LastName +"& "), sb => sb.ToString())
          });

而且,这是有效的。我想知道如果我写这样的查询会有什么缺点或设计缺陷。

4

1 回答 1

1

ctx.Books.AsEnumerable()您将从数据库中选择整个书籍表并开始在内存中处理它。这不是好的设计。您应该做的是,选择您需要的数据,然后在本地进行处理。

例如

var temp = ctx.Books
  // probably some where clause
  .Select(x => new
      {
        BookID = x.BookID,
          BookName = x.Title,
          Authors = x.AuthorBooks.Select(a => a.Author)
          })
  .ToArray();

var books = temp.Select(x => new { 
    x.BookID, 
    x.BookName, 
    Authors = x.Authors.Aggregate(new StringBuilder(), (sb, r) => sb.Append(r.FirstName + " " + r.LastName +"& "), sb => sb.ToString()) 
});
于 2013-06-08T12:29:29.393 回答