我的目标:
- 让它更加规范化。(更相似的等待时间 - 线性增长)
- 扩大到 XXX 甚至可能是 XXXX 数量的怪物和 npc。
- 有没有你们所有的 Java 大师给我一些想法:D
我的问题如下:
- 它永远不会达到第二次迭代循环(npc)
- “浪费”的时间太随意了;将有数百个(如果不是更多)生物/NPC 进行迭代,这个解决方案根本无法扩展
- 我的服务器将在主循环中执行许多其他“事件”,其中一些使用相同的 HashMap,因此使用 ConcurrentHashMap(计算命中损坏/等)
代码:我希望这已经是 SSCCE 了。我试图尽可能地减少脂肪......
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap;
public class WaitTime {
static ConcurrentHashMap<String, Integer> mobInstanceMap = new ConcurrentHashMap<String, Integer>();
static ConcurrentHashMap<String, Integer> npcInstanceMap = new ConcurrentHashMap<String, Integer>();
public static void main(String[] args){
mobInstanceMap.put("mob1", 0);
mobInstanceMap.put("mob2", 0);
mobInstanceMap.put("mob3", 0);
npcInstanceMap.put("npc1", 0);
npcInstanceMap.put("npc2", 0);
npcInstanceMap.put("npc3", 0);
while(true){
updateEntityLocations();
try {
Thread.sleep(20);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
private static void updateEntityLocations() {
long entityMovementLoopStartTime = System.nanoTime();
Iterator<Entry<String, Integer>> it = mobInstanceMap.entrySet().iterator();
while (it.hasNext()) {
Entry<String, Integer> mobEntity = it.next();
String mobName = mobEntity.getKey();
int lastWalkTime = mobEntity.getValue();
int mobWalkSpeed = 4000;
long walkWaitTime = lastWalkTime;
long elapsedTime = (long) ((System.nanoTime() - entityMovementLoopStartTime) / 100.0);
walkWaitTime += elapsedTime;
if (walkWaitTime >= mobWalkSpeed){
System.out.println("Wasted time(walking)(" + mobName + "): " + (walkWaitTime - mobWalkSpeed));
//mobInstanceMap.put(mobName, 0);
mobInstanceMap.replace(mobName, 0);
} else { //!(walkWaitTime >= walkSpeed)
//mobInstanceMap.put(mobName, (int) walkWaitTime);
mobInstanceMap.replace(mobName, (int) walkWaitTime);
}
}
Iterator<Entry<String, Integer>> it1 = npcInstanceMap.entrySet().iterator();
while (it.hasNext()) {
Entry<String, Integer> npcEntity = it1.next();
String npcCoords = npcEntity.getKey();
int lastWalkTime = npcEntity.getValue();
int npcWalkSpeed = 4000;
long walkWaitTime = lastWalkTime;
long elapsedTime = (long) ((System.nanoTime() - entityMovementLoopStartTime) / 100.0);
walkWaitTime += elapsedTime;
if (walkWaitTime >= npcWalkSpeed){
System.out.println("Wasted time(walking)(" + npcCoords + "): " + (walkWaitTime - npcWalkSpeed));
npcInstanceMap.put(npcCoords, 0);
} else { //!(walkWaitTime >= walkSpeed)
npcInstanceMap.put(npcCoords, (int) walkWaitTime);
}
}
}
}
安慰:
Wasted time(walking)(mob2): 58
Wasted time(walking)(mob1): 1983
Wasted time(walking)(mob3): 2288
Wasted time(walking)(mob3): 266
Wasted time(walking)(mob1): 122
Wasted time(walking)(mob3): 232
Wasted time(walking)(mob2): 23
Wasted time(walking)(mob1): 674
Wasted time(walking)(mob3): 27
Wasted time(walking)(mob1): 159
Wasted time(walking)(mob3): 1723
Wasted time(walking)(mob2): 119
Wasted time(walking)(mob1): 676
Wasted time(walking)(mob3): 1698
Wasted time(walking)(mob3): 3983
Wasted time(walking)(mob1): 182
正如您所看到的,如果您使用 put(commented out) 而不是 replace 运行它,它的运行速度会稍慢且更不稳定。