我一直认为存在查询的 LINQ to SQL 等效项是使用 Any()。但我最近在 LINQ 中编写了一个查询,它基本上是试图查找单个表中是否存在重复记录。
任何context.Contacts.Any(c => ((c.FirstName == contact.FirstName && c.LastName == contact.LastName && c.AddressLine1 == contact.AddressLine1 && c.Zip == contact.Zip)||
(!String.IsNullOrEmpty(contact.Email) && c.Email == contact.Email)))
匹配条件很容易找到具有相同 FirstName、LastName 和 AddressLine1 或相同电子邮件的联系人。此查询在 30 秒(默认)后超时,此表中只有 500K 行。
在哪里context.Contacts.Where(c => ((c.FirstName == contact.FirstName && c.LastName == contact.LastName && c.AddressLine1 == contact.AddressLine1 && c.Zip == contact.Zip)||
(!String.IsNullOrEmpty(contact.Email) && c.Email == contact.Email))).Count()>0
我被迫使用 Where 子句,然后计数大于 0 以查找集合中是否存在任何重复项。我无法理解的是,为什么简单的 Any 子句上的 LINQ to SQL 会超时。任何解释在这里都会非常棒。
编辑
来自 LINQ Pad ANY 的 SQL
SELECT
(CASE
WHEN EXISTS(
SELECT NULL AS [EMPTY]
FROM [Accounts].[Contacts] AS [t0]
WHERE ([t0].[CompanyID] = @p0) AND ((([t0].[FirstName] = @p1) AND ([t0].[LastName] = @p2) AND ([t0].[AddressLine1] = @p3) AND ([t0].[Zip] = @p4)) OR (([t0].[FirstName] = @p5) AND ([t0].[LastName] = @p6) AND (EXISTS(
SELECT NULL AS [EMPTY]
FROM [Accounts].[PhoneNumbers] AS [t1]
WHERE ([t1].[ContactNumber] = @p7) AND ([t1].[ContactID] = [t0].[ContactID])
))))
) THEN 1
ELSE 0
END) AS [value]
在哪里
SELECT [t0].[ContactID]
,[t0].[CompanyID]
,[t0].[CompanyTitle]
,[t0].[FirstName]
,[t0].[LastName]
,[t0].[AddressLine1]
,[t0].[AddressLine2]
,[t0].[City]
,[t0].[State]
,[t0].[Zip]
,[t0].[Email]
,[t0].[Salutation]
,[t0].[IsActive]
FROM [Accounts].[Contacts] AS [t0]
WHERE ([t0].[CompanyID] = @p0)
AND (
(
([t0].[FirstName] = @p1)
AND ([t0].[LastName] = @p2)
AND ([t0].[AddressLine1] = @p3)
AND ([t0].[Zip] = @p4)
)
OR (
([t0].[FirstName] = @p5)
AND ([t0].[LastName] = @p6)
AND (
EXISTS (
SELECT NULL AS [EMPTY]
FROM [Accounts].[PhoneNumbers] AS [t1]
WHERE ([t1].[ContactNumber] = @p7)
AND ([t1].[ContactID] = [t0].[ContactID])
)
)
)
)