4

我正在尝试将某些模型拟合到某些数据中，并且生成的模型可以预测合理的值，并且这些图看起来是正确的。但是当提取系数并分别绘制函数时，它们没有任何意义！我显然做错了什么，所以请有人告诉我错误在哪里？

数据：

dput(distcur)
structure(list(id1 = c(1.6, 1.6, 1.6, 1.6, 1.6, 1.6, 1.6, 1.6
), range = c(-39.898125, -21.448125, -11.07, -3.22875, 3.776484375, 
12.309609375, 22.399453125, 39.235078125), meanrat = c(20.2496, 
17.7504273504274, 12.76875, 2.475, -1.4295652173913, -3.9603305785124, 
-14.7008547008547, -19.7366666666667)), .Names = c("id1", "range", 
"meanrat"), row.names = 9:16, class = "data.frame")

library(ggplot2)

id = 1.6
degree = 3

press_x <- seq(min(distcur$range), max(distcur$range), length = 500)
moddist3b <- lm(meanrat ~ poly(range, degree), distcur) 
valsdist = data.frame(predict(moddist3b, data.frame(range = press_x)))

colnames(valsdist) = "pred"

valsdist$id1 = id

allvals = cbind(valsdist, press_x)

summary(moddist3b)

#test plot
pdf(paste("mod-",measure,id ))
TITLE = paste("Distance ID: ", id, "Model = line, Points = exp1")

p = ggplot(allvals, aes(x=press_x, y=pred, colour=factor(id1))) + 
             geom_line() + 
geom_point(data=distcur, aes(shape=factor(id1), x = range, y = meanrat, colour = factor(id1))) +
                ylim(-100, 100) +
                labs(title=TITLE) +
                ylab("Mean Rating (%)") +
                xlab(measure) 


print(p)
dev.off()

模型与点的图

我知道图像质量很差，但它表明它是正确的。然而，从用于构建函数的模型中获得的系数看起来与该图完全不同：

summary(moddist3b)

Call:
lm(formula = meanrat ~ poly(range, degree), data = distcur)

Residuals:
       9       10       11       12       13       14       15       16 
-0.20134  0.44939  1.65996 -2.80500 -1.14594  2.98617 -0.92081 -0.02244 

Coefficients:
                     Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
(Intercept)            1.6770     0.8281   2.025   0.1128    
poly(range, degree)1 -37.7155     2.3423 -16.102  8.7e-05 ***
poly(range, degree)2  -2.9435     2.3423  -1.257   0.2773    
poly(range, degree)3   6.4888     2.3423   2.770   0.0503 .  
---
Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 

Residual standard error: 2.342 on 4 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.9853, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9743 
F-statistic: 89.51 on 3 and 4 DF,  p-value: 0.0004019

给函数 y = 6.49x^3 −2.94x​​^2 − 37.72x + 1.68

在谷歌上绘制清楚地表明该函数与 R 中的图（来自模型）完全不同

https://www.google.com/search?q=6.49x^3+%E2%88%922.94x​​^2+%E2%88%92+37.72x+%2B+1.68&ie=utf-8&oe=utf- 8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial&client=iceweasel-a&channel=fflb#client=iceweasel-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aunofficial&channel=fflb&sclient=psy-ab&q=6.49*x^3+-2.94 *x^2+-+37.72*x+%2B+1.68&oq=6.49*x^3+-2.94*x^2+-+37.72*x+%2B+1.68&gs_l=serp.3...3610.3975.1.4155。 2.2.0.0.0.0.107.147.1j1.2.0...0.0...1c.1.14.psy-ab.4C6De6gdmtg&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.47008514,d.d2k&fp=5e81885614cfda4f&biw= 1440&bih=667

4

1 回答 1

7

您遇到的问题与ggplot. 相反，它是您定义线性模型的方式。顺便说一句，我弄清楚发生了什么的方法是在 0 时进行预测：

R> (moddist3b <- lm(meanrat ~ poly(range, 3), distcur) )

Coefficients:
(Intercept)  poly(range, 3)1  poly(range, 3)2  poly(range, 3)3  
       1.68           -37.72            -2.94             6.49  

R> predict(moddist3b, data.frame(range = 0))
    1 
2.733

并注意预测已关闭（应为 1.68）。

无论如何，您需要使用参数来拟合您的模型raw=TRUE

(moddist3b <- lm(meanrat ~ poly(range, 3, raw=TRUE), distcur) )
predict(moddist3b, data.frame(range = 0))

这给了你你所期望的。默认情况下，poly使用正交多项式。有关详细信息，请参阅此博客文章和poly帮助页面。

于 2013-05-25T14:05:38.603 回答