0

Valgrind 中的第一个错误：

 /media/d2bfa67b-a3e7-4dde-9f3a-119260e3a29c/workspace/000-back-office/var/root_data/global_product_id/global_product_id_cut.root
 ==14840== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
 ==14840==    at 0x8B264E0: inflateReset2 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1.2.3.4)
 ==14840==    by 0x8B265D8: inflateInit2_ (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1.2.3.4)
 ==14840==    by 0x5627ABA: R__unzip (in /media/d2bfa67b-a3e7-4dde-9f3a-119260e3a29c /workspace/000-back-office/src/root/lib/libCore.so)
 ==14840==    by 0x5E1B409: TKey::ReadObjWithBuffer(char*) (in /media/d2bfa67b-a3e7-4dde-9f3a-119260e3a29c/workspace/000-back-office/src/root/lib/libRIO.so)
 ==14840==    by 0x5DFB673: TFile::GetStreamerInfoList() (in /media/d2bfa67b-a3e7-4dde-9f3a-119260e3a29c/workspace/000-back-office/src/root/lib/libRIO.so)
 ==14840==    by 0x5DF9CC9: TFile::ReadStreamerInfo() (in /media/d2bfa67b-a3e7-4dde-9f3a-119260e3a29c/workspace/000-back-office/src/root/lib/libRIO.so)
 ==14840==    by 0x5DFCE68: TFile::Init(bool) (in /media/d2bfa67b-a3e7-4dde-9f3a-119260e3a29c/workspace/000-back-office/src/root/lib/libRIO.so)
 ==14840==    by 0x5DFDE12: TFile::TFile(char const*, char const*, char const*, int) (in /media/d2bfa67b-a3e7-4dde-9f3a-119260e3a29c/workspace/000-back-office/src/root/lib/libRIO.so)
 ==14840==    by 0x43BBA6: ROOTproduct_id_record::loadROOT(bool) (ROOTproductidrecord.cpp:1078)
 ==14840==    by 0x42E5CD: ROOTproduct_id::loadROOT() (ROOTproductid.cpp:142)
 ==14840==    by 0x469D17: main (report_engine.cpp:528)

ROOTproductidrecord.cpp:1077-1078

std::cout<<filename_char<<"\n";
TFile* my_rootfile_pointer = new TFile(filename_char); //open an existing file for reading (default).

如您所见，filename_char 有一个值......下一个函数（TFile::TFile）来自一个稳定的 CERN 库。

我不明白 ROOTproductidrecord.cpp:1078 有什么问题...

4

1 回答 1

2

来自http://zlib.net/zlib_faq.html#faq36：“Valgrind（或一些类似的内存访问检查器）说 deflate 正在执行取决于未初始化值的条件跳转。这不是一个错误吗？

不会。出于性能原因，这是故意的，并且 deflate 的输出不受影响。这直到最近才开始出现，因为 zlib 1.2.x 默认使用 malloc() 进行分配，而早期版本使用 calloc()，它将分配的内存归零。尽管代码是正确的，但 1.2.4 及更高版本已更改为不刺激这些检查器。”

于 2013-05-23T07:38:20.790 回答