我正在尝试将 /ezmlm-(除 'weed' 或 'return')\s+/ 与正则表达式匹配。下面演示了一个做正确事情的 foreach 循环,以及一个几乎可以做的尝试的正则表达式:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
my @tests = (
{ msg => "want 'yes', string has ezmlm, but not weed or return",
str => q[|/usr/local/bin/ezmlm-reject '<snip>'],
},
{ msg => "want 'yes', array has ezmlm, but not weed or return",
str => [ <DATA> ],
},
{ msg => "want 'no' , has ezmlm-weed",
str => q[|/usr/local/bin/ezmlm-weed '<snip>'],
},
{ msg => "want 'no' , doesn't have ezmlm-anything",
str => q[|/usr/local/bin/else '<snip>'],
},
{ msg => "want 'no' , ezmlm email pattern",
str => q[crazy/but/legal/ezmlm-wacky@example.org],
},
);
print "foreach regex\n";
foreach ( @tests ) {
print doit_fe( ref $_->{str} ? @{$_->{str}} : $_->{str} ) ? "yes" : "no";
print "\t";
print doit_re( ref $_->{str} ? @{$_->{str}} : $_->{str} ) ? "yes" : "no";
print "\t<--- $_->{msg}\n";
};
# for both of the following subs:
# @_ will contain one or more lines of data
# match the pattern /ezmlm-(any word except 'weed' or 'return')\s+/
sub doit_fe {
my $has_ezmlm = 0;
foreach ( @_ ) {
next if $_ !~ m/ezmlm-(.*?)\s/;
return 0 if $1 eq 'weed' or $1 eq 'return';
$has_ezmlm++;
};
return $has_ezmlm;
};
sub doit_re { return grep /ezmlm-(?!weed|return)/, @_; };
__DATA__
|/usr/local/bin/ezmlm-reject '<snip>'
|/usr/local/bin/ezmlm-issubn '<snip>'
|/usr/local/bin/ezmlm-send '<snip>'
|/usr/local/bin/ezmlm-archive '<snip>'
|/usr/local/bin/ezmlm-warn '<snip>'
示例程序的输出如下:
foreach regex
yes yes <--- want 'yes', string has ezmlm, but not weed or return
yes yes <--- want 'yes', array has ezmlm, but not weed or return
no no <--- want 'no' , has ezmlm-weed
no no <--- want 'no' , doesn't have ezmlm-anything
no yes <--- want 'no' , ezmlm email pattern
在最后一个例子中,正则表达式失败,匹配一个愚蠢但合法的电子邮件地址。如果我修改正则表达式,在负前瞻模式之后放置一个 \s,如下所示:
grep /ezmlm-(?!weed|return)\s+/
正则表达式根本不匹配。我认为它与负面模式的工作方式有关。我试过让否定变得不贪婪,但似乎有一些隐藏在“perldoc perlre”中的教训正在逃避我。是否可以使用单个正则表达式来做到这一点?