sql - 使用 Tablefunc 旋转多列

Question

有没有人习惯于使用tablefunc多个变量而不是只使用行名？文档说明：

对于具有相同 row_name 值的所有行，“额外”列应该是相同的。

如果不组合我想要旋转的列（我非常怀疑这会给我所需的速度），我不确定如何做到这一点。一种可能的方法是使实体为数字并将其以毫秒为单位添加到本地，但这似乎是一种不稳定的继续方式。

我已经编辑了在回答这个问题时使用的数据：PostgreSQL Crosstab Query。

 CREATE TEMP TABLE t4 (
  timeof   timestamp
 ,entity    character
 ,status    integer
 ,ct        integer);

 INSERT INTO t4 VALUES 
  ('2012-01-01', 'a', 1, 1)
 ,('2012-01-01', 'a', 0, 2)
 ,('2012-01-02', 'b', 1, 3)
 ,('2012-01-02', 'c', 0, 4);

 SELECT * FROM crosstab(
     'SELECT timeof, entity, status, ct
      FROM   t4
      ORDER  BY 1,2,3'
     ,$$VALUES (1::text), (0::text)$$)
 AS ct ("Section" timestamp, "Attribute" character, "1" int, "0" int);

回报：

部分 | 属性 | 1 | 0
---------------+-----------+---+---
 2012-01-01 00:00:00 | 一个 | 1 | 2
 2012-01-02 00:00:00 |     乙     | 3 | 4

因此，正如文档所述，额外的列（即“属性”）对于每个行名（即“节”）都是相同的。因此，它报告第二行的b，即使 'entity' 也具有该 'timeof' 值的'c'值。

期望的输出：

Section                   | Attribute | 1 | 0
--------------------------+-----------+---+---
2012-01-01 00:00:00       |     a     | 1 | 2
2012-01-02 00:00:00       |     b     | 3 |  
2012-01-02 00:00:00       |     c     |   | 4

有什么想法或参考吗？

更多背景知识：我可能需要对数十亿行执行此操作，并且我正在测试以长格式和宽格式存储这些数据，并查看是否可以tablefunc比使用常规聚合函数更有效地从长格式转换为宽格式。
我将每分钟对大约 300 个实体进行大约 100 次测量。通常，我们需要比较给定实体在给定秒内所做的不同测量，因此我们需要经常使用宽格式。此外，对特定实体进行的测量是高度可变的。

编辑：我找到了一个资源：http ://www.postgresonline.com/journal/categories/24-tablefunc 。

Answer 1

您的查询的问题在于b并且c共享相同的时间戳2012-01-02 00:00:00，并且您在查询中首先拥有该timestamp列timeof，因此 - 即使您添加了粗体强调 -b并且c只是属于同一组的额外列2012-01-02 00:00:00。b自（引用手册）以来，仅返回第一个 ( ) ：

该row_name列必须是第一个。和列必须是最后两列，按此顺序category。和value之间的任何列都被视为“额外”。对于具有相同值的所有行，“额外”列应该是相同的。row_namecategoryrow_name

大胆强调我的。
只需恢复前两列的顺序以entity生成行名，它就可以按需要工作：

SELECT * FROM crosstab(
      'SELECT entity, timeof, status, ct
       FROM   t4
       ORDER  BY 1'
      ,'VALUES (1), (0)')
 AS ct (
    "Attribute" character
   ,"Section" timestamp
   ,"status_1" int
   ,"status_0" int);

entity当然，必须是唯一的。

重申

• row_name 第一的
• （可选）接下来extra的列
• category（由第二个参数定义）和last。value

额外的列从每个分区的第一行开始填充。row_name其他行的值被忽略，每列只有一列row_name要填充。通常，对于 one 的每一行，这些都是相同的row_name，但这取决于您。

对于您的答案中的不同设置：

SELECT localt, entity
     , msrmnt01, msrmnt02, msrmnt03, msrmnt04, msrmnt05  -- , more?
FROM   crosstab(
        'SELECT dense_rank() OVER (ORDER BY localt, entity)::int AS row_name
              , localt, entity -- additional columns
              , msrmnt, val
         FROM   test
         -- WHERE  ???   -- instead of LIMIT at the end
         ORDER  BY localt, entity, msrmnt
         -- LIMIT ???'   -- instead of LIMIT at the end
     , $$SELECT generate_series(1,5)$$)  -- more?
     AS ct (row_name int, localt timestamp, entity int
          , msrmnt01 float8, msrmnt02 float8, msrmnt03 float8, msrmnt04 float8, msrmnt05 float8 -- , more?
            )
LIMIT 1000  -- ??!!

难怪您的测试中的查询执行得非常糟糕。您的测试设置有 1400 万行，您在处理所有这些行之前，将其中的大部分用LIMIT 1000. 对于减少的结果集添加WHERE条件或LIMIT源查询！

此外，您使用的阵列非常昂贵。我改为使用 dense_rank() 生成一个代理行名称。

db<>fiddle here - 使用更简单的测试设置和更少的行。

Answer 2

在我最初的问题中，我应该将它用于我的示例数据：

CREATE TEMP TABLE t4 (
 timeof    date
,entity    integer
,status    integer
,ct        integer);
INSERT INTO t4 VALUES 
 ('2012-01-01', 1, 1, 1)
,('2012-01-01', 1, 0, 2)
,('2012-01-01', 3, 0, 3)
,('2012-01-02', 2, 1, 4)
,('2012-01-02', 3, 1, 5)
,('2012-01-02', 3, 0, 6);

有了这个，我必须同时关注时间和实体。由于tablefunc只使用一列进行透视，因此您需要找到一种方法将两个维度都填充到该列中。（http://www.postgresonline.com/journal/categories/24-tablefunc）。我选择了数组，就像那个链接中的例子一样。

SELECT (timestamp 'epoch' + row_name[1] * INTERVAL '1 second')::date 
           as localt, 
           row_name[2] As entity, status1, status0
FROM crosstab('SELECT ARRAY[extract(epoch from timeof), entity] as row_name,
                    status, ct
               FROM t4 
               ORDER BY timeof, entity, status'
     ,$$VALUES (1::text), (0::text)$$) 
          as ct (row_name integer[], status1 int, status0 int)

FWIW，我尝试使用字符数组，到目前为止，我的设置看起来更快；9.2.3 PostgreSQL。

这是结果和期望的输出。

localt           | entity | status1 | status0
--------------------------+---------+--------
2012-01-01       |   1    |    1    |   2
2012-01-01       |   3    |         |   3
2012-01-02       |   2    |    4    |  
2012-01-02       |   3    |    5    |   6

我很好奇这在更大的数据集上的表现如何，并将在以后报告。

Answer 3

好的，所以我在离我的用例更近的桌子上运行了这个。要么我做错了，要么交叉表不适合我使用。

首先我做了一些类似的数据：

CREATE TABLE public.test (
    id serial primary key,
    msrmnt integer,
    entity integer,
    localt timestamp,
    val    double precision
);
CREATE INDEX ix_test_msrmnt
   ON public.test (msrmnt);
 CREATE INDEX ix_public_test_201201_entity
   ON public.test (entity);
CREATE INDEX ix_public_test_201201_localt
  ON public.test (localt);
insert into public.test (msrmnt, entity, localt, val)
select *
from(
SELECT msrmnt, entity, localt, random() as val 
FROM generate_series('2012-01-01'::timestamp, '2012-01-01 23:59:00'::timestamp, interval '1 minutes') as localt
join 
(select *
FROM generate_series(1, 50, 1) as msrmnt) as msrmnt
on 1=1
join 
(select *
FROM generate_series(1, 200, 1) as entity) as entity
on 1=1) as data;

然后我运行了几次交叉表代码：

explain analyze
SELECT (timestamp 'epoch' + row_name[1] * INTERVAL '1 second')::date As localt, row_name[2] as entity
    ,msrmnt01,msrmnt02,msrmnt03,msrmnt04,msrmnt05,msrmnt06,msrmnt07,msrmnt08,msrmnt09,msrmnt10
    ,msrmnt11,msrmnt12,msrmnt13,msrmnt14,msrmnt15,msrmnt16,msrmnt17,msrmnt18,msrmnt19,msrmnt20
    ,msrmnt21,msrmnt22,msrmnt23,msrmnt24,msrmnt25,msrmnt26,msrmnt27,msrmnt28,msrmnt29,msrmnt30
    ,msrmnt31,msrmnt32,msrmnt33,msrmnt34,msrmnt35,msrmnt36,msrmnt37,msrmnt38,msrmnt39,msrmnt40
    ,msrmnt41,msrmnt42,msrmnt43,msrmnt44,msrmnt45,msrmnt46,msrmnt47,msrmnt48,msrmnt49,msrmnt50
    FROM crosstab('SELECT ARRAY[extract(epoch from localt), entity] as row_name, msrmnt, val
               FROM public.test
               ORDER BY localt, entity, msrmnt',$$VALUES  ( 1::text),( 2::text),( 3::text),( 4::text),( 5::text),( 6::text),( 7::text),( 8::text),( 9::text),(10::text)
                                                         ,(11::text),(12::text),(13::text),(14::text),(15::text),(16::text),(17::text),(18::text),(19::text),(20::text)
                                                         ,(21::text),(22::text),(23::text),(24::text),(25::text),(26::text),(27::text),(28::text),(29::text),(30::text)
                                                         ,(31::text),(32::text),(33::text),(34::text),(35::text),(36::text),(37::text),(38::text),(39::text),(40::text)
                                                         ,(41::text),(42::text),(43::text),(44::text),(45::text),(46::text),(47::text),(48::text),(49::text),(50::text)$$)
        as ct (row_name integer[],msrmnt01 double precision, msrmnt02 double precision,msrmnt03 double precision, msrmnt04 double precision,msrmnt05 double precision, 
                    msrmnt06 double precision,msrmnt07 double precision, msrmnt08 double precision,msrmnt09 double precision, msrmnt10 double precision
                 ,msrmnt11 double precision, msrmnt12 double precision,msrmnt13 double precision, msrmnt14 double precision,msrmnt15 double precision, 
                    msrmnt16 double precision,msrmnt17 double precision, msrmnt18 double precision,msrmnt19 double precision, msrmnt20 double precision
                 ,msrmnt21 double precision, msrmnt22 double precision,msrmnt23 double precision, msrmnt24 double precision,msrmnt25 double precision, 
                    msrmnt26 double precision,msrmnt27 double precision, msrmnt28 double precision,msrmnt29 double precision, msrmnt30 double precision
                 ,msrmnt31 double precision, msrmnt32 double precision,msrmnt33 double precision, msrmnt34 double precision,msrmnt35 double precision, 
                    msrmnt36 double precision,msrmnt37 double precision, msrmnt38 double precision,msrmnt39 double precision, msrmnt40 double precision
                 ,msrmnt41 double precision, msrmnt42 double precision,msrmnt43 double precision, msrmnt44 double precision,msrmnt45 double precision, 
                    msrmnt46 double precision,msrmnt47 double precision, msrmnt48 double precision,msrmnt49 double precision, msrmnt50 double precision)
limit 1000

在第三次尝试获得这个：

QUERY PLAN
Limit  (cost=0.00..20.00 rows=1000 width=432) (actual time=110236.673..110237.667 rows=1000 loops=1)
  ->  Function Scan on crosstab ct  (cost=0.00..20.00 rows=1000 width=432) (actual time=110236.672..110237.598 rows=1000 loops=1)
Total runtime: 110699.598 ms

然后我运行了几次标准解决方案：

explain analyze
select localt, entity, 
 max(case when msrmnt =  1 then val else null end) as msrmnt01
,max(case when msrmnt =  2 then val else null end) as msrmnt02
,max(case when msrmnt =  3 then val else null end) as msrmnt03
,max(case when msrmnt =  4 then val else null end) as msrmnt04
,max(case when msrmnt =  5 then val else null end) as msrmnt05
,max(case when msrmnt =  6 then val else null end) as msrmnt06
,max(case when msrmnt =  7 then val else null end) as msrmnt07
,max(case when msrmnt =  8 then val else null end) as msrmnt08
,max(case when msrmnt =  9 then val else null end) as msrmnt09
,max(case when msrmnt = 10 then val else null end) as msrmnt10
,max(case when msrmnt = 11 then val else null end) as msrmnt11
,max(case when msrmnt = 12 then val else null end) as msrmnt12
,max(case when msrmnt = 13 then val else null end) as msrmnt13
,max(case when msrmnt = 14 then val else null end) as msrmnt14
,max(case when msrmnt = 15 then val else null end) as msrmnt15
,max(case when msrmnt = 16 then val else null end) as msrmnt16
,max(case when msrmnt = 17 then val else null end) as msrmnt17
,max(case when msrmnt = 18 then val else null end) as msrmnt18
,max(case when msrmnt = 19 then val else null end) as msrmnt19
,max(case when msrmnt = 20 then val else null end) as msrmnt20
,max(case when msrmnt = 21 then val else null end) as msrmnt21
,max(case when msrmnt = 22 then val else null end) as msrmnt22
,max(case when msrmnt = 23 then val else null end) as msrmnt23
,max(case when msrmnt = 24 then val else null end) as msrmnt24
,max(case when msrmnt = 25 then val else null end) as msrmnt25
,max(case when msrmnt = 26 then val else null end) as msrmnt26
,max(case when msrmnt = 27 then val else null end) as msrmnt27
,max(case when msrmnt = 28 then val else null end) as msrmnt28
,max(case when msrmnt = 29 then val else null end) as msrmnt29
,max(case when msrmnt = 30 then val else null end) as msrmnt30
,max(case when msrmnt = 31 then val else null end) as msrmnt31
,max(case when msrmnt = 32 then val else null end) as msrmnt32
,max(case when msrmnt = 33 then val else null end) as msrmnt33
,max(case when msrmnt = 34 then val else null end) as msrmnt34
,max(case when msrmnt = 35 then val else null end) as msrmnt35
,max(case when msrmnt = 36 then val else null end) as msrmnt36
,max(case when msrmnt = 37 then val else null end) as msrmnt37
,max(case when msrmnt = 38 then val else null end) as msrmnt38
,max(case when msrmnt = 39 then val else null end) as msrmnt39
,max(case when msrmnt = 40 then val else null end) as msrmnt40
,max(case when msrmnt = 41 then val else null end) as msrmnt41
,max(case when msrmnt = 42 then val else null end) as msrmnt42
,max(case when msrmnt = 43 then val else null end) as msrmnt43
,max(case when msrmnt = 44 then val else null end) as msrmnt44
,max(case when msrmnt = 45 then val else null end) as msrmnt45
,max(case when msrmnt = 46 then val else null end) as msrmnt46
,max(case when msrmnt = 47 then val else null end) as msrmnt47
,max(case when msrmnt = 48 then val else null end) as msrmnt48
,max(case when msrmnt = 49 then val else null end) as msrmnt49
,max(case when msrmnt = 50 then val else null end) as msrmnt50
from sample
group by localt, entity
limit 1000

在第三次尝试获得这个：

QUERY PLAN
Limit  (cost=2257339.69..2270224.77 rows=1000 width=24) (actual time=19795.984..20090.626 rows=1000 loops=1)
  ->  GroupAggregate  (cost=2257339.69..5968242.35 rows=288000 width=24) (actual time=19795.983..20090.496 rows=1000 loops=1)
        ->  Sort  (cost=2257339.69..2293339.91 rows=14400088 width=24) (actual time=19795.626..19808.820 rows=50001 loops=1)
              Sort Key: localt
              Sort Method: external merge  Disk: 478568kB
              ->  Seq Scan on sample  (cost=0.00..249883.88 rows=14400088 width=24) (actual time=0.013..2245.247 rows=14400000 loops=1)
Total runtime: 20197.565 ms

因此，就我而言，到目前为止，交叉表似乎不是一个解决方案。这只是我将拥有多年的一天。事实上，我可能不得不使用宽格式（非规范化）表，尽管对实体进行的测量是可变的并且引入了新的测量，但我不会在这里讨论。

这是我使用 Postgres 9.2.3 的一些设置：

name                    setting
max_connections             100
shared_buffers          2097152
effective_cache_size    6291456
maintenance_work_mem    1048576
work_mem                 262144