我写了一个程序,我很高兴我会运行它几十次——我什至写下了多次执行的结果——现在它不起作用。
你可能会认为我这么说是高高在上,或者我可能只是改变了一些台词,但我真的不记得对程序做过任何改变。
问题是SIGFPE
,根据输入,在程序的不同执行中出现。尽管在std::unordered_set<Point<T> *>
.
这是我进行此类插入的代码片段:
std::vector<Point<T> *> _point, _centroid;
std::vector<std::unordered_set<Point<T> *> > _cluster;
// Main procedure -- pseudocode
for (point in _point) {
cluster_id = centroid_with_min_distance(point, _centroid);
has_changed = _change_cluster(point, cluster_id);
}
// Changes from one "point->_cluster's unordered_set" to "c's unordered_set"
bool _change_cluster(Point<T> *point, const unsigned int& c) {
if ((point->_cluster == c) &&
(_cluster[c].find(point) != _cluster[c].end())) {
return false;
}
_cluster[point->_cluster].erase(point);
_cluster[c].insert(point); // Insertion that raises the SIGFPE exception
point->_cluster = c;
return true;
}
这是 valgrind 输出的一个重要部分:
==17636== Invalid read of size 8
==17636== at 0x40A758: std::pair<std::__detail::_Hashtable_iterator<
Point<unsigned int>*, true, false>, bool>
std::_Hashtable<Point<unsigned int>*, Point<unsigned int>*,
std::allocator<Point<unsigned int>*>,
std::_Identity<Point<unsigned int>*>,
std::equal_to<Point<unsigned int>*>,
std::hash<Point<unsigned int>*>,
std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing,
std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash,
std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, false, true, true>::
_M_insert<Point<unsigned int>* const&>(
Point<unsigned int>* const&&&,
std::integral_constant<bool, true>) (hashtable.h:966)
==17636== by 0x408EDA: std::_Hashtable<Point<unsigned int>*,
Point<unsigned int>*, std::allocator<Point<unsigned int>*>,
std::_Identity<Point<unsigned int>*>,
std::equal_to<Point<unsigned int>*>,
std::hash<Point<unsigned int>*>,
std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing,
std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash,
std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, false, true, true>::
insert(Point<unsigned int>* const&) (hashtable.h:400)
==17636== ... (calls from my program) ...
==17636== Address 0x620a028 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==17636==
==17636==
==17636== Process terminating with default action of signal 8 (SIGFPE)
==17636== Integer divide by zero at address 0x402D07D7C
==17636== at 0x40252F: std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing::operator()(
unsigned long, unsigned long) const (hashtable_policy.h:376)
==17636== by 0x40A66C: std::__detail::_Hash_code_base<Point<unsigned int>*,
Point<unsigned int>*, std::_Identity<Point<unsigned int>*>,
std::equal_to<Point<unsigned int>*>,
std::hash<Point<unsigned int>*>,
std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing,
std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, false>::_M_bucket_index(
Point<unsigned int>* const&, unsigned long,
unsigned long) const (hashtable_policy.h:758)
==17636== by 0x40A772: std::pair<std::__detail::_Hashtable_iterator<
Point<unsigned int>*, true, false>, bool>
std::_Hashtable<Point<unsigned int>*, Point<unsigned int>*,
std::allocator<Point<unsigned int>*>,
std::_Identity<Point<unsigned int>*>,
std::equal_to<Point<unsigned int>*>,
std::hash<Point<unsigned int>*>,
std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing,
std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash,
std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, false, true, true>::
_M_insert<Point<unsigned int>* const&>(
Point<unsigned int>* const&&&,
std::integral_constant<bool, true>) (hashtable.h:966)
==17636== by 0x408EDA: std::_Hashtable<Point<unsigned int>*,
Point<unsigned int>*, std::allocator<Point<unsigned int>*>,
std::_Identity<Point<unsigned int>*>,
std::equal_to<Point<unsigned int>*>,
std::hash<Point<unsigned int>*>,
std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing,
std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash,
std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, false, true, true>::
insert(Point<unsigned int>* const&) (hashtable.h:400)
==17636== ... (calls from my program) ...
这里的问题是:由于我的程序中有可能导致除以零的计算——尽管它们与此过程没有直接关系——是否有可能是错误被插入所掩盖?或者我应该在插入指针时做一些额外的处理std::unordered_set<T>
?
我正在编译程序x86_64 GNU/Linux
,我正在使用g++ (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3
.