这是我的代码。
try
{
// code throws potentially unknown exception
}
catch (...)
{
std::exception_ptr eptr = std::current_exception();
// then what ?
}
理想情况下,如果它是 std::exception,我想获取与异常关联的字符串。
// 然后呢?
这是什么:
#include <exception>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
std::string what(const std::exception_ptr &eptr = std::current_exception())
{
if (!eptr) { throw std::bad_exception(); }
try { std::rethrow_exception(eptr); }
catch (const std::exception &e) { return e.what() ; }
catch (const std::string &e) { return e ; }
catch (const char *e) { return e ; }
catch (...) { return "who knows"; }
}
int main()
{
try { throw std::runtime_error("it's success!"); }
catch (...) { std::cerr << "Here is WHAT happened: " << what() << std::endl; }
try { throw 42; } catch (...) { std::cerr << "and now what: " << what() << std::endl; }
}
它打印的内容:
Here is WHAT happened: it's success!
and now what: who knows
http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/1851d2ab9faa3a24
所以这允许进入what
包罗万象的条款。
但是如果嵌套了异常怎么办???这是什么:
std::string what(const std::exception_ptr &eptr = std::current_exception());
template <typename T>
std::string nested_what(const T &e)
{
try { std::rethrow_if_nested(e); }
catch (...) { return " (" + what(std::current_exception()) + ")"; }
return {};
}
std::string what(const std::exception_ptr &eptr)
{
if (!eptr) { throw std::bad_exception(); }
try { std::rethrow_exception(eptr); }
catch (const std::exception &e) { return e.what() + nested_what(e); }
catch (const std::string &e) { return e ; }
catch (const char *e) { return e ; }
catch (...) { return "who knows"; }
}
使用此处的示例:
#include <fstream>
...
// sample function that catches an exception and wraps it in a nested exception
void open_file(const std::string& s)
{
try {
std::ifstream file(s);
file.exceptions(std::ios_base::failbit);
} catch(...) {
std::throw_with_nested( std::runtime_error("Couldn't open " + s) );
}
}
// sample function that catches an exception and wraps it in a nested exception
void run()
{
try {
open_file("nonexistent.file");
} catch(...) {
std::throw_with_nested( std::runtime_error("run() failed") );
}
}
int main()
{
try { throw std::runtime_error("success!"); }
catch (...) { std::cerr << "Here is WHAT happened: \"" << what() << '\"' << std::endl; }
try { run(); }
catch (...) { std::cerr << "what happened for run: \"" << what() << '\"' << std::endl; }
}
打印的内容:
Here is WHAT happened: "success!"
what happened for run: "run() failed (Couldn't open nonexistent.file (basic_ios::clear))"
http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/901a0c19297f02b5
但是如果递归太深怎么办?如果堆栈溢出怎么办?优化了什么:
#include <typeinfo>
template <typename T>
std::exception_ptr get_nested(const T &e)
{
try
{
auto &nested = dynamic_cast<const std::nested_exception&>(e);
return nested.nested_ptr();
}
catch (const std::bad_cast &)
{ return nullptr; }
}
#if 0 // alternative get_nested
std::exception_ptr get_nested()
{
try { throw ; }
catch (const std::nested_exception &e) { return e.nested_ptr(); }
catch (...) { return nullptr ; }
}
#endif
std::string what(std::exception_ptr eptr = std::current_exception())
{
if (!eptr) { throw std::bad_exception(); }
std::string whaaat;
std::size_t num_nested = 0;
next:
{
try
{
std::exception_ptr yeptr;
std::swap(eptr, yeptr);
std::rethrow_exception(yeptr);
}
catch (const std::exception &e) { whaaat += e.what() ; eptr = get_nested(e); }
catch (const std::string &e) { whaaat += e ; }
catch (const char *e) { whaaat += e ; }
catch (...) { whaaat += "who knows"; }
if (eptr) { whaaat += " ("; num_nested++; goto next; }
}
whaaat += std::string(num_nested, ')');
return whaaat;
}
相同的内容:
Here is WHAT happened: "success!"
here is what: "run() failed (Couldn't open nonexistent.file (basic_ios::clear))"
http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/32ec5af5b1d43453
UPD
类似的功能可以在 C++03 中通过使用允许throw
在 catch 块之外重新出现异常的技巧来实现:https ://stackoverflow.com/a/3641809/5447906
try
{
std::rethrow_exception(eptr);
}
catch (const std::exception& e)
{
std::cerr << e.what() << std::endl;
}
在您的情况下,使用std::current_exception
似乎有点过头了,因为您似乎不想存储或复制以std::exception_ptr
供以后处理(这是它的唯一意图,它无助于以任何方式获取有关未知异常的其他信息)。如果您只想处理 a 的情况std::exception
,那么简单的情况如何:
try
{
// code throws potentially unknown exception
}
catch (const std::exception &e)
{
std::cerr << e.what() << '\n'; // or whatever
}
catch (...)
{
// well ok, still unknown what to do now,
// but a std::exception_ptr doesn't help the situation either.
std::cerr << "unknown exception\n";
}
在我看来,这不是最好的解决方案,但似乎有效。
try
{
// code throws potentially unknown exception
}
catch (const std::exception& e)
{
std::cerr << e.what() << std::endl;
}
catch (...)
{
std::exception_ptr eptr = std::current_exception();
// then what ?
LogUnknownException();
}
感谢 ForEveR 的初始解决方案,但我不确定是否要在 catch 块内再次抛出。