出于好奇，有什么方法可以获取您编写的代码行数（在特定项目中）？
我尝试使用 perforce p4 describe #CLN | wc -l，但除了这么多边缘情况（包括注释、添加新行等）之外，它也跳过了新添加的文件。如果我们尝试显示物理代码行但新添加的文件仍然会导致问题，则可以忽略边缘情况。
问问题
7322 次
6 回答
5
我继续编写了一个 Python 脚本，它打印出用户添加/更改的代码行数以及每次更改的平均行数。
使用 Python 2.7.2 在 Windows 上测试。您可以从命令行运行 - 它假定您的路径中有 p4。
用法：codestats.py -u [用户名]
它也适用于 git：codestats.py -u [authorname] -g。
它做了一些黑名单来删除批量添加（例如您刚刚添加了一个库），并且还对某些类型的文件（例如 .HTML 文件等）强加了一个黑名单。否则，它工作得很好。
希望这可以帮助！
########################################################################
# Script that computes the lines of code stats for a perforce/git user.
########################################################################
import argparse
import logging
import subprocess
import sys
import re
VALID_ARGUMENTS = [
("user", "-u", "--user", "Run lines of code computation for the specified user.", 1),
("change", "-c", "--change", "Just display lines of code in the passed in change (useful for debugging).", 1),
("git", "-g", "--git", "Use git rather than perforce (which is the default versioning system queried).", 0)
]
class PrintHelpOnErrorArgumentParser(argparse.ArgumentParser):
def error(self, message):
logging.error("error: {0}\n\n".format(message))
self.print_help()
sys.exit(2)
def is_code_file(depot_path):
fstat_output = subprocess.Popen(['p4', 'fstat', depot_path], stdout=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()[0].split('\n')
text_file = False
head_type_regex = re.compile('^... headType (\S+)\s*$')
for line in fstat_output:
head_type_line = head_type_regex.match(line)
if head_type_line:
head_type = head_type_line.group(1)
text_file = (head_type.find('text') != -1)
if text_file:
blacklisted_file_types = ['html', 'css', 'twb', 'twbx', 'tbm', 'xml']
for file_type in blacklisted_file_types:
if re.match('^\/\/depot.*\.{}#\d+$'.format(file_type), depot_path):
text_file = False
break
return text_file
def parse_args():
parser = PrintHelpOnErrorArgumentParser()
for arg_name, short_switch, long_switch, help, num_args in VALID_ARGUMENTS:
if num_args != 0:
parser.add_argument(
short_switch,
nargs=num_args,
type=str,
dest=arg_name)
else:
parser.add_argument(
long_switch,
short_switch,
action="store_true",
help=help,
dest=arg_name)
return parser.parse_args()
file_edited_regex = re.compile('^... .*?#\d+ edit\s*$')
file_deleted_regex = re.compile('^... .*?#\d+ delete\s*$')
file_integrated_regex = re.compile('^... .*?#\d+ integrate\s*$')
file_added_regex = re.compile('^... (.*?#\d+) add\s*$')
affected_files_regex = re.compile('^Affected files ...')
outliers = [] # Changes that seem as if they weren't hand coded and merit inspection
def num_lines_in_file(depot_path):
lines = len(subprocess.Popen(['p4', 'print', depot_path], stdout=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()[0].split('\n'))
return lines
def parse_change(changelist):
change_description = subprocess.Popen(['p4', 'describe', '-ds', changelist], stdout=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()[0].split('\n')
parsing_differences = False
parsing_affected_files = False
differences_regex = re.compile('^Differences \.\.\..*$')
line_added_regex = re.compile('^add \d+ chunks (\d+) lines.*$')
line_removed_regex = re.compile('^deleted \d+ chunks (\d+) lines.*$')
line_changed_regex = re.compile('^changed \d+ chunks (\d+) / (\d+) lines.*$')
file_diff_regex = re.compile('^==== (\/\/depot.*#\d+)\s*\S+$')
skip_file = False
num_lines_added = 0
num_lines_deleted = 0
num_lines_changed_added = 0
num_lines_changed_deleted = 0
num_files_added = 0
num_files_edited = 0
for line in change_description:
if differences_regex.match(line):
parsing_differences = True
elif affected_files_regex.match(line):
parsing_affected_files = True
elif parsing_differences:
if file_diff_regex.match(line):
regex_match = file_diff_regex.match(line)
skip_file = not is_code_file(regex_match.group(1))
elif not skip_file:
regex_match = line_added_regex.match(line)
if regex_match:
num_lines_added += int(regex_match.group(1))
else:
regex_match = line_removed_regex.match(line)
if regex_match:
num_lines_deleted += int(regex_match.group(1))
else:
regex_match = line_changed_regex.match(line)
if regex_match:
num_lines_changed_added += int(regex_match.group(2))
num_lines_changed_deleted += int(regex_match.group(1))
elif parsing_affected_files:
if file_added_regex.match(line):
file_added_match = file_added_regex.match(line)
depot_path = file_added_match.group(1)
if is_code_file(depot_path):
lines_in_file = num_lines_in_file(depot_path)
if lines_in_file > 3000:
# Anomaly - probably a copy of existing code - discard this
lines_in_file = 0
num_lines_added += lines_in_file
num_files_added += 1
elif file_edited_regex.match(line):
num_files_edited += 1
return [num_files_added, num_files_edited, num_lines_added, num_lines_deleted, num_lines_changed_added, num_lines_changed_deleted]
def contains_integrates(changelist):
change_description = subprocess.Popen(['p4', 'describe', '-s', changelist], stdout=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()[0].split('\n')
contains_integrates = False
parsing_affected_files = False
for line in change_description:
if affected_files_regex.match(line):
parsing_affected_files = True
elif parsing_affected_files:
if file_integrated_regex.match(line):
contains_integrates = True
break
return contains_integrates
#################################################
# Note: Keep this function in sync with
# generate_line.
#################################################
def generate_output_specifier(output_headers):
output_specifier = ''
for output_header in output_headers:
output_specifier += '| {:'
output_specifier += '{}'.format(len(output_header))
output_specifier += '}'
if output_specifier != '':
output_specifier += ' |'
return output_specifier
#################################################
# Note: Keep this function in sync with
# generate_output_specifier.
#################################################
def generate_line(output_headers):
line = ''
for output_header in output_headers:
line += '--' # for the '| '
header_padding_specifier = '{:-<'
header_padding_specifier += '{}'.format(len(output_header))
header_padding_specifier += '}'
line += header_padding_specifier.format('')
if line != '':
line += '--' # for the last ' |'
return line
# Returns true if a change is a bulk addition or a private change
def is_black_listed_change(user, changelist):
large_add_change = False
all_adds = True
num_adds = 0
is_private_change = False
is_third_party_change = False
change_description = subprocess.Popen(['p4', 'describe', '-s', changelist], stdout=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()[0].split('\n')
for line in change_description:
if file_edited_regex.match(line) or file_deleted_regex.match(line):
all_adds = False
elif file_added_regex.match(line):
num_adds += 1
if line.find('... //depot/private') != -1:
is_private_change = True
break
if line.find('... //depot/third-party') != -1:
is_third_party_change = True
break
large_add_change = all_adds and num_adds > 70
#print "{}: {}".format(changelist, large_add_change or is_private_change)
return large_add_change or is_third_party_change
change_header_regex = re.compile('^Change (\d+)\s*.*?\s*(\S+)@.*$')
def get_user_and_change_header_for_change(changelist):
change_description = subprocess.Popen(['p4', 'describe', '-s', changelist], stdout=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()[0].split('\n')
user = None
change_header = None
for line in change_description:
change_header_match = change_header_regex.match(line)
if change_header_match:
user = change_header_match.group(2)
change_header = line
break
return [user, change_header]
if __name__ == "__main__":
log = logging.getLogger()
log.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
args = parse_args()
user_stats = {}
user_stats['num_changes'] = 0
user_stats['lines_added'] = 0
user_stats['lines_deleted'] = 0
user_stats['lines_changed_added'] = 0
user_stats['lines_changed_removed'] = 0
user_stats['total_lines'] = 0
user_stats['files_edited'] = 0
user_stats['files_added'] = 0
change_log = []
if args.git:
git_log_command = ['git', 'log', '--author={}'.format(args.user[0]), '--pretty=tformat:', '--numstat']
git_log_output = subprocess.Popen(git_log_command, stdout=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()[0].split('\n')
git_log_line_regex = re.compile('^(\d+)\s*(\d+)\s*\S+$')
total = 0
adds = 0
subs = 0
for git_log_line in git_log_output:
line_match = git_log_line_regex.match(git_log_line)
if line_match:
adds += int(line_match.group(1))
subs += int(line_match.group(2))
total = adds - subs
num_commits = 0
git_shortlog_command = ['git', 'shortlog', '--author={}'.format(args.user[0]), '-s']
git_shortlog_output = subprocess.Popen(git_shortlog_command, stdout=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()[0].split('\n')
git_shortlog_line_regex = re.compile('^\s*(\d+)\s+.*$')
for git_shortlog_line in git_shortlog_output:
line_match = git_shortlog_line_regex.match(git_shortlog_line)
if line_match:
num_commits += int(line_match.group(1))
print "Git Stats for {}: Commits: {}. Lines of code: {}. Average Lines Per Change: {}.".format(args.user[0], num_commits, total, total*1.0/num_commits)
sys.exit(0)
elif args.change:
[args.user, change_header] = get_user_and_change_header_for_change(args.change)
change_log = [change_header]
else:
change_log = subprocess.Popen(['p4', 'changes', '-u', args.user, '-s', 'submitted'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()[0].split('\n')
output_headers = ['Current Change', 'Num Changes', 'Files Added', 'Files Edited']
output_headers.append('Lines Added')
output_headers.append('Lines Deleted')
if not args.git:
output_headers.append('Lines Changed (Added/Removed)')
avg_change_size = 0.0
output_headers.append('Total Lines')
output_headers.append('Avg. Lines/Change')
line = generate_line(output_headers)
output_specifier = generate_output_specifier(output_headers)
print line
print output_specifier.format(*output_headers)
print line
output_specifier_with_carriage_return = output_specifier + '\r'
for change in change_log:
change_match = change_header_regex.search(change)
if change_match:
user_stats['num_changes'] += 1
changelist = change_match.group(1)
if not is_black_listed_change(args.user, changelist) and not contains_integrates(changelist):
[files_added_in_change, files_edited_in_change, lines_added_in_change, lines_deleted_in_change, lines_changed_added_in_change, lines_changed_removed_in_change] = parse_change(change_match.group(1))
if lines_added_in_change > 5000 and changelist not in outliers:
outliers.append([changelist, lines_added_in_change])
else:
user_stats['lines_added'] += lines_added_in_change
user_stats['lines_deleted'] += lines_deleted_in_change
user_stats['lines_changed_added'] += lines_changed_added_in_change
user_stats['lines_changed_removed'] += lines_changed_removed_in_change
user_stats['total_lines'] += lines_changed_added_in_change
user_stats['total_lines'] -= lines_changed_removed_in_change
user_stats['total_lines'] += lines_added_in_change
user_stats['files_edited'] += files_edited_in_change
user_stats['files_added'] += files_added_in_change
current_output = [changelist, user_stats['num_changes'], user_stats['files_added'], user_stats['files_edited']]
current_output.append(user_stats['lines_added'])
current_output.append(user_stats['lines_deleted'])
if not args.git:
current_output.append('{}/{}'.format(user_stats['lines_changed_added'], user_stats['lines_changed_removed']))
current_output.append(user_stats['total_lines'])
current_output.append(user_stats['total_lines']*1.0/user_stats['num_changes'])
print output_specifier_with_carriage_return.format(*current_output),
print
print line
if len(outliers) > 0:
print "Outliers (changes that merit inspection - and have not been included in the stats):"
outlier_headers = ['Changelist', 'Lines of Code']
outlier_specifier = generate_output_specifier(outlier_headers)
outlier_line = generate_line(outlier_headers)
print outlier_line
print outlier_specifier.format(*outlier_headers)
print outlier_line
for change in outliers:
print outlier_specifier.format(*change)
print outlier_line
于 2015-12-31T22:23:39.873 回答
4
是的，有很多方法可以计算代码行数。
tl;dr安装Eclipse Metrics 插件。这是如何做的说明。如果您想在没有 Eclipse 的情况下执行此操作，下面有一个简短的脚本。
外壳脚本
我将向您介绍非常通用的方法。它适用于 Linux，但它可以移植到其他系统。将这 2 行保存到lines.sh文件中：
#!/bin/sh
find -name "*.java" | awk '{ system("wc "$0) }' | awk '{ print $1 "\t" $4; lines += $1; files++ } END { print "Total: " lines " lines in " files " files."}'
这是一个使用 的 shell 脚本find，wc而且很棒awk。添加执行权限：
chmod +x lines.sh
现在我们可以执行我们的shell脚本了。
假设您保存lines.sh在/home/you/workspace/projectX.
脚本计算文件中的行数.java，这些文件位于/home/you/workspace/projectX.
所以让我们用./lines.sh. 您可以更改*.java任何其他类型的文件。
样本输出：
adam@adam ~/workspace/Checkers $ ./lines.sh
23 ./src/Checkers.java
14 ./src/event/StartGameEvent.java
38 ./src/event/YourColorEvent.java
52 ./src/event/BoardClickEvent.java
61 ./src/event/GameQueue.java
14 ./src/event/PlayerEscapeEvent.java
14 ./src/event/WaitEvent.java
16 ./src/event/GameEvent.java
38 ./src/event/EndGameEvent.java
38 ./src/event/FakeBoardEvent.java
127 ./src/controller/ServerThread.java
14 ./src/controller/ServerConfig.java
46 ./src/controller/Server.java
170 ./src/controller/Controller.java
141 ./src/controller/ServerNetwork.java
246 ./src/view/ClientNetwork.java
36 ./src/view/Messages.java
53 ./src/view/ButtonField.java
47 ./src/view/ViewConfig.java
32 ./src/view/MainWindow.java
455 ./src/view/View.java
36 ./src/view/ImageLoader.java
88 ./src/model/KingJump.java
130 ./src/model/Cords.java
70 ./src/model/King.java
77 ./src/model/FakeBoard.java
90 ./src/model/CheckerMove.java
53 ./src/model/PlayerColor.java
73 ./src/model/Checker.java
201 ./src/model/AbstractPiece.java
75 ./src/model/CheckerJump.java
154 ./src/model/Model.java
105 ./src/model/KingMove.java
99 ./src/model/FieldType.java
269 ./src/model/Board.java
56 ./src/model/AbstractJump.java
80 ./src/model/AbstractMove.java
82 ./src/model/BoardState.java
Total: 3413 lines in 38 files.
于 2013-01-07T18:29:01.680 回答
4
其他答案似乎错过了源代码控制历史方面的事情。
来自http://forums.perforce.com/index.php?/topic/359-how-many-lines-of-code-have-i-written/
分多个步骤计算答案：
1）添加文件：
p4 filelog ... | grep ' add on .* by <username>'
p4 print -q foo#1 | wc -l
2）更改的文件：
p4 describe <changelist> | grep "^>" | wc -l
将所有计数组合在一起（脚本...），您将得到一个总数。
您可能还想用 grep 删除空白行或没有字母数字字符的行？
此外，如果您定期执行此操作，则在 P4Python 中编写代码并逐步执行会更有效 - 保留历史记录并仅查看新提交。
于 2013-01-08T09:48:19.357 回答
0
找一个应用程序来计算行数，计算行数有很多微妙之处 - 注释、空白行、每行多个运算符等。
Visual Studio 具有“计算代码指标”功能，因为您没有提到一种语言，我无法更具体地说明要使用哪种工具，只是说“查找”和“grep”可能不是要走的路。
还要考虑代码行不能衡量实际进度的事实。路线图上已完成的功能衡量进度，代码行数越低越好。如果一个自豪的开发人员声称他的 60,000 行代码非常了不起，只是发现有一种方法可以在 1000 行中做同样的事情，这并不是第一次。
于 2013-01-07T18:40:34.297 回答
0
看看SLOCCount。它只计算实际的代码行数并执行一些额外的计算。
在 OSX 上，您可以通过 Homebrew 轻松安装它brew install sloccount。
我的一个项目的示例输出：
$ sloccount .
Have a non-directory at the top, so creating directory top_dir
Adding /Users/padde/Desktop/project/./Gemfile to top_dir
Adding /Users/padde/Desktop/project/./Gemfile.lock to top_dir
Adding /Users/padde/Desktop/project/./Procfile to top_dir
Adding /Users/padde/Desktop/project/./README to top_dir
Adding /Users/padde/Desktop/project/./application.rb to top_dir
Creating filelist for config
Adding /Users/padde/Desktop/project/./config.ru to top_dir
Creating filelist for controllers
Creating filelist for db
Creating filelist for helpers
Creating filelist for models
Creating filelist for public
Creating filelist for tmp
Creating filelist for views
Categorizing files.
Finding a working MD5 command....
Found a working MD5 command.
Computing results.
SLOC Directory SLOC-by-Language (Sorted)
256 controllers ruby=256
66 models ruby=66
10 config ruby=10
9 top_dir ruby=9
5 helpers ruby=5
0 db (none)
0 public (none)
0 tmp (none)
0 views (none)
Totals grouped by language (dominant language first):
ruby: 346 (100.00%)
Total Physical Source Lines of Code (SLOC) = 346
Development Effort Estimate, Person-Years (Person-Months) = 0.07 (0.79)
(Basic COCOMO model, Person-Months = 2.4 * (KSLOC**1.05))
Schedule Estimate, Years (Months) = 0.19 (2.28)
(Basic COCOMO model, Months = 2.5 * (person-months**0.38))
Estimated Average Number of Developers (Effort/Schedule) = 0.34
Total Estimated Cost to Develop = $ 8,865
(average salary = $56,286/year, overhead = 2.40).
SLOCCount, Copyright (C) 2001-2004 David A. Wheeler
SLOCCount is Open Source Software/Free Software, licensed under the GNU GPL.
SLOCCount comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, and you are welcome to
redistribute it under certain conditions as specified by the GNU GPL license;
see the documentation for details.
Please credit this data as "generated using David A. Wheeler's 'SLOCCount'."
于 2013-01-07T18:43:38.010 回答
-1
有一种更简单的方法可以做到这一切，顺便说一下，它比使用 grep 更快：
首先获取特定用户的所有更改列表，这是一个命令行命令，您可以使用 os.system() 在 python 脚本中使用它：
p4 changes -u <username> > 'some_text_file.txt'
现在您需要提取所有更改列表编号，我们将使用正则表达式，这里使用 python 完成：
f = open('some_text_file.txt','r')
lists = f.readlines()
pattern = re.compile(r'\b[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]\b')
labels = []
for i in lists:
labels.append(pattern.findall(i))
changelists = []
for h in labels:
if(type(h) is list):
changelists.append(str(h[0]))
else:
changelists.append(str(h))
现在您在“标签”中拥有所有更改列表编号。我们将遍历列表并为每个更改列表查找添加的行数和删除的行数，获得最终差异将为我们提供添加的总行数。以下代码留置权正是这样做的：
for i in changelists:
os.system('p4 describe -ds '+i+' | findstr "^add" >> added.txt')
os.system('p4 describe -ds '+i+' | findstr "^del" >> deleted.txt')
added = []
deleted = []
file = open('added.txt')
for i in file:
added.append(i)
count = []
count_added = 0
count_add = 0
count_del = 0
for j in added:
count = [int(s) for s in j.split() if s.isdigit()]
count_add += count[1]
count = []
file = open('deleted.txt')
for i in file:
deleted.append(i)
for j in labels:
count = [int(s) for s in j.split() if s.isdigit()]
count_del += count[1]
count = []
count_added = count_add - count_del
print count_added
count_added 将包含用户添加的行数。
于 2016-04-04T07:28:31.877 回答