这段代码运行得很慢:
public static class DB
{
readonly static InlineSql sql = new InlineSql();
public static IEnumerable<LabItem> GetLabItemsFromLabLineItems(IEnumerable<LabLineItem> items)
{
/*
* Business Rule :
* The sproc used to retrieve lab line items has no way of "grouping" lab items out of line items.
* To compensate, the sproc orders its results by IDCode, we group everything and use the first of each grouping to represent that ID Code.
* That very same item is also the first item in its Items property.
* */
return items
.GroupBy(c => c.IDCode , c => c, (c, d) => d.First())
.Select(c => new LabItem(c.IDCode, c.OrderGuid, c.Name, c.SignificantDtm, c.Status, c.Description, items.Where(d => string.Compare(d.IDCode, c.IDCode, true) == 0 )));
}
}
特别是我们将 d.IDCode 与 c.IDCode 进行比较的 select 语句似乎是问题所在。该行报告来自 ANTS 的命中数为 9000 万,时间百分比为 14.8。 items.count
大约是9千。
我知道我的断点没有被命中 9000 万次。这里的命中数是什么意思?
其他有用的代码:
LabItem
有List<LabLineItem>
这就是我们在这里比较的。 LabLineItem.Equals
:
public override bool Equals(object obj)
{
LabLineItem otherItem = obj as LabLineItem;
if (otherItem == null) return false;
return
OrderGuid == otherItem.OrderGuid
&& IDCode == otherItem.IDCode
&& SignificantDtm == otherItem.SignificantDtm
&& ObservationGuid == otherItem.ObservationGuid
&& string.Compare(Value, otherItem.Value, true) == 0;
}
public override int GetHashCode()
{
return
OrderGuid.GetHashCode()
^ IDCode.GetHashCode()
^ SignificantDtm.GetHashCode()
^ ObservationGuid.GetHashCode();
}