这是 Kerrek SB 的替代解决方案:
#include <tuple>
#include <type_traits>
#include <cstdlib>
template <typename HeadPred, typename ...TailPreds>
struct CombinePredAnd
{
template<typename H, typename ...Ts>
explicit CombinePredAnd(H const & h, Ts const &...ts)
: _preds(h, ts...){}
template <typename T>
bool operator()(T t){
return eval(t,_preds);
}
private:
template<typename T, size_t I = 0, typename ...Ps>
typename std::enable_if<sizeof ...(Ps) == I,bool>::type
static eval(T t, std::tuple<Ps...>) {
return true;
}
template<typename T, size_t I = 0, typename ...Ps>
typename std::enable_if<sizeof ...(Ps) != I,bool>::type
static eval(T t, std::tuple<Ps...> const & preds) {
auto const & pred = std::get<I>(preds);
return pred(t) && eval<T,I + 1>(t,preds);
}
std::tuple<HeadPred, TailPreds...> _preds;
};
这可以按照 Kerrek SB 建议的任意谓词函子的通用合取或析取的方式概括如下,通过选择合取或析取来参数化。附加了一个测试程序,使用 gcc 4.7.2 和 clang 3.2 构建:
#include <tuple>
#include <type_traits>
#include <functional>
#include <cstdlib>
template <class AndOrOr, typename HeadPred, typename ...TailPreds>
struct dis_or_con_join
{
static_assert(
std::is_same<AndOrOr,std::logical_and<bool>>::value ||
std::is_same<AndOrOr,std::logical_or<bool>>::value,
"AndOrOr must be std::logical_and<bool> or std::logical_or<bool>");
template<typename H, typename ...Ts>
explicit dis_or_con_join(H const & h, Ts const &...ts)
: _preds(h, ts...){}
template <typename T>
bool operator()(T t){
return eval(t,_preds);
}
private:
static const bool conjunction =
std::is_same<AndOrOr,std::logical_and<bool>>::value;
template<typename T, size_t I = 0, typename ...Ps>
typename std::enable_if<sizeof ...(Ps) == I,bool>::type
static eval(T t, std::tuple<Ps...>) {
return conjunction;
}
template<typename T, size_t I = 0, typename ...Ps>
typename std::enable_if<sizeof ...(Ps) != I,bool>::type
static eval(T t, std::tuple<Ps...> const & preds) {
auto lamb = conjunction ?
[](bool b){ return b; } :
[](bool b){ return !b; };
auto const & pred = std::get<I>(preds);
return lamb(lamb(pred(t)) && lamb(eval<T,I + 1>(t,preds)));
}
std::tuple<HeadPred, TailPreds...> _preds;
};
template<typename HeadPred, typename ...TailPreds>
using conjunction =
dis_or_con_join<std::logical_and<bool>,HeadPred,TailPreds...>;
template<typename HeadPred, typename ...TailPreds>
using disjunction =
dis_or_con_join<std::logical_or<bool>,HeadPred,TailPreds...>;
// Test...
#include <iostream>
#include <list>
#include <algorithm>
using namespace std;
// For various predicates with various constructors...
template<typename T>
struct is_in_list
// Stores an arbitrary sized list of its type T constructor arguments
// and then with tell us whether any given T is in its list
{
is_in_list(initializer_list<T> il)
: _vals(il.begin(),il.end()){}
bool operator()(T t) const {
return find(_vals.begin(),_vals.end(),t) != _vals.end();
}
list<T> _vals;
};
int main()
{
is_in_list<char> inl03 = {'\0','\3'};
is_in_list<long> inl013 = {0,1,3};
is_in_list<float> inl0123 = {0.0f,1.0f,2.0f,3.0f};
conjunction<is_in_list<char>,is_in_list<long>,is_in_list<float>>
conj{inl03,inl013,inl0123};
disjunction<is_in_list<char>,is_in_list<long>,is_in_list<float>>
disj{inl03,inl013,inl0123};
cout << "conjunction..." << endl;
cout << 1 << " is " << (conj(1) ? "" : "not ")
<< "in all the lists" << endl;
cout << 0 << " is " << (conj(0) ? "" : "not ")
<< "in all the lists" << endl;
cout << 3 << " is " << (conj(3) ? "" : "not ")
<< "in all the lists" << endl;
cout << "disjunction..." << endl;
cout << 1 << " is in " << (disj(1) ? "at least one " : "none ")
<< "of the lists" << endl;
cout << 2 << " is in " << (disj(2) ? "at least one " : "none ")
<< "of the lists" << endl;
cout << 3 << " is in " << (disj(3) ? "at least one " : "none ")
<< "of the lists" << endl;
cout << 4 << " is in " << (disj(4) ? "at least one " : "none ")
<< "of the lists" << endl;
return 0;
}
可能不清楚的线:
return lamb(lamb(pred(t)) && lamb(eval<T,I + 1>(t,preds)));
只是利用等价性:
P or Q = not(not(P) and not(Q))
输出:-
conjunction...
1 is not in all the lists
0 is in all the lists
3 is in all the lists
disjunction...
1 is in at least one of the lists
2 is in at least one of the lists
3 is in at least one of the lists
4 is in none of the lists