2

许多解决方案都可以将列表转换为DataTable使用反射的方法,并且可以用于转换匿名类型。但是,它有很多匿名类型列表,那么性能可能是一个问题。

这是DataTable从列表创建的唯一方法吗?有更快的方法吗?

4

2 回答 2

6

使用正确命名的 POCO/DTO/etc 类绝对会更好,但它仍然可以完成。反射的成本可以通过使用元编程来消除,理想情况下是使用诸如FastMember 之类的预卷库,如下所示。

请注意,匿名类型的使用已强制使用IList此处(而不是IList<T>List<T>)。使用命名类型最好使用通用版本。这将允许进行一些更改 - 特别itemTypetypeof(T),并且即使对于空表也可以创建正确的列。也许更重要的是,它将强制列表是同质的,而不必对此做出假设。

using FastMember;
using System;
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Data;
static class Program
{
    static void Main()
    {
        var list = GetList();
        var table = ToTable(list);
    }
    static DataTable ToTable(IList source)
    {
        if (source == null) throw new ArgumentNullException();
        var table = new DataTable();
        if (source.Count == 0) return table;

        // blatently assume the list is homogeneous
        Type itemType = source[0].GetType();
        table.TableName = itemType.Name;
        List<string> names = new List<string>();
        foreach (var prop in itemType.GetProperties())
        {
            if (prop.CanRead && prop.GetIndexParameters().Length == 0)
            {
                names.Add(prop.Name);
                table.Columns.Add(prop.Name, prop.PropertyType);
            }
        }
        names.TrimExcess();

        var accessor = TypeAccessor.Create(itemType);
        object[] values = new object[names.Count];
        foreach (var row in source)
        {
            for (int i = 0; i < values.Length; i++)
            {
                values[i] = accessor[row, names[i]];
            }
            table.Rows.Add(values);
        }
        return table;
    }
    static IList GetList()
    {
        return new[] {
            new { foo = "abc", bar = 123},
            new { foo = "def", bar = 456},
            new { foo = "ghi", bar = 789},
        };
    }
}
于 2012-10-31T07:55:59.297 回答
1

改进了@MarcGravell对支持的回答:

  1. 一个可选的字段列表,指定要保留的列及其顺序。
  2. 可空类型。

    static public DataTable ToDataTable(this IList anonymousSource, List<string> keepOrderedFieldsOpt = null)
    {
        // https://stackoverflow.com/a/13153479/538763 - @MarcGravell
        // Added keepOrderedFieldsOpt, nullable types - @crokusek
    
        if (anonymousSource == null) throw new ArgumentNullException();
        DataTable table = new DataTable();
        if (anonymousSource.Count == 0) return table;
    
        // blatently assume the list is homogeneous
        Type itemType = anonymousSource[0].GetType();
        table.TableName = itemType.Name;            
    
        // Build up orderedColumns
        //
        List<PropertyInfo> orderedColumns;            
        if (keepOrderedFieldsOpt != null)
        {
            Dictionary<string, PropertyInfo> propertiesByName = itemType.GetProperties()
                .ToDictionary(p => p.Name, p => p);
    
            orderedColumns = new List<PropertyInfo>();
            List<string> missingFields = null;
    
            foreach (string field in keepOrderedFieldsOpt)
            {
                PropertyInfo tempPropertyInfo;
                if (propertiesByName.TryGetValue(field, out tempPropertyInfo))
                    orderedColumns.Add(tempPropertyInfo);
                else
                    (missingFields ?? (missingFields = new List<string>())).Add(field);
            }
    
            if (missingFields != null) 
                throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("keepOrderedFieldsOpt", "Argument keepOrderedFieldsOpt contains invalid field name(s): " + String.Join(", ", missingFields));
        }
        else
            orderedColumns = itemType.GetProperties().ToList();
    
        List<string> names = new List<string>();
        foreach (PropertyInfo prop in orderedColumns)
        {
            if (prop.CanRead && prop.GetIndexParameters().Length == 0)
            {
                names.Add(prop.Name);
    
                // Nullable support from stackoverflow.com/a/23233413/538763 - @Damith
                table.Columns.Add(prop.Name, Nullable.GetUnderlyingType(prop.PropertyType) ?? prop.PropertyType);
            }
        }
        names.TrimExcess();
    
        TypeAccessor accessor = TypeAccessor.Create(itemType);
        object[] values = new object[names.Count];
        foreach (var row in anonymousSource)
        {
            for (int i = 0; i < values.Length; i++)
                values[i] = accessor[row, names[i]];
    
            table.Rows.Add(values);
        }
        return table;
    }
    
于 2015-11-20T01:10:22.957 回答