3

好的。所以我目前正在尝试在 C# 中创建一个以接口为参数的接口列表。为了更清楚地说明这一点，让我举个例子：

public interface IPlate<T> where T : IWaffle {}
public interface IWaffles {}

public class BelgiumWaffle : IWaffle {}
public class FalafelWaffle : IWaffle {}
public class HugePlate : IPlate<BelgiumWaffle> {}
public class SmallPlate : IPlate<FalafelWaffle> {}


// Now, I want to do the following:
var plates = new List<IPlate<IWaffle>>();
plates.add(new HugePlate());
plates.add(new SmallPlate());

目标是能够将 IPlate 对象列表序列化为 XML。我希望使用泛型来做到这一点，但我不断收到错误消息，告诉我在尝试添加时存在一些参数错误（又名 - 类型不匹配）。只是不确定我在这里做错了什么。这对我来说似乎是正确的，但我必须遗漏一些东西（显然）。

更新：我应该提到这是.NET v3.5

更新：对不起！写关于板类定义的问题时出现一些拼写错误。

4

6 回答 6

4

我认为你应该使用协方差（.NET 4.0）

public interface IPlate<out T> where T : IWaffle {}

并替换IPancake为IWaffle

var plates = new List<IPlate<IPancake>>();
于 2012-10-25T13:56:46.630 回答
2

既不HugePlate也不SmallPlate实现列表IPlate<IPancake>所需的接口plates。

于 2012-10-25T13:58:43.700 回答
1

除了协方差（正如@JakubKonecki 已经指出的那样），您对 HugePlate 和 SmallPlate 的定义看起来不正确，因为它们需要实现IPlate.

试试这个：

public interface IPlate<out T> where T : IWaffle {}
public interface IWaffle {}

public class BelgiumWaffle : IWaffle {}
public class FalafelWaffle : IWaffle {}
public class HugePlate<T> : IPlate<T> where T : IWaffle {}
public class SmallPlate<T> : IPlate<T> where T : IWaffle {}
于 2012-10-25T14:11:52.647 回答
1

在 .NET Framework 3.5 中，您没有像在 .NET Framework 4.0 中那样在out泛型协方差上使用的参数。

您可以尝试使用您的非通用版本IPlate（在这种情况下我命名它IPlateNG）来解决它。

考虑.NET Framework 4.0中的以下示例（我必须扩展它以表明我的观点）：

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;

public interface IWaffle { string Eat(); }
// on C# 4.0 you just put the "out" to mark the covariance (and that is it)
public interface IPlate<out T> where T : IWaffle { T GetMyWaffle(); }

public class BelgiumWaffle : IWaffle {
    public string Eat() { return "Eating a Belgium Waffle"; }
    public string Breakfast() { return "Breakfasting a Belgium Waffle"; }
}
public class FalafelWaffle : IWaffle {
    public string Eat() { return "Eating a Falafel Waffle"; }
    public string Dinner() { return "Having dinner with a Falafel Waffle"; }
}
public class HugePlate : IPlate<BelgiumWaffle> {
    public BelgiumWaffle GetMyWaffle() { return new BelgiumWaffle(); }
}
public class SmallPlate : IPlate<FalafelWaffle> {
    public FalafelWaffle GetMyWaffle() { return new FalafelWaffle(); }
}

class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        var plates = new List<IPlate<IWaffle>>();
        plates.Add(new HugePlate());
        plates.Add(new SmallPlate());

        IPlate<IWaffle> aPlate = plates[0];
        // Anyway, when you get a member of the collection you'll get the interface, not a concrete class (obviously).
        IWaffle aWaffle = aPlate.GetMyWaffle();
        // So you cannot invoke any specifics (like Breakfast or Dinner)
        Console.WriteLine(aWaffle.Eat());

        // But if you cast the member of the collection to the specific class (or interface)
        IPlate<FalafelWaffle> aSmallPlate = (SmallPlate)plates[1];
        // Then you'll get the concrete class without casting again
        FalafelWaffle aFalafel = aSmallPlate.GetMyWaffle();
        Console.WriteLine(aFalafel.Dinner());
    }
}

现在这对于.NET Framework 3.5也是一样的：

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;

public interface IWaffle { string Eat(); }
// In this case I define this extra inteface which is non-generic
// And inside it, we need a new method equivalent to the one on the generic one
public interface IPlateNG { IWaffle GetWaffle(); }
// And make the generic one implement the non-generic one
public interface IPlate<T> : IPlateNG where T : IWaffle { T GetMyWaffle(); }

public class BelgiumWaffle : IWaffle {
    public string Eat() { return "Eating a Belgium Waffle"; }
    public string Breakfast() { return "Breakfasting a Belgium Waffle"; }
}
public class FalafelWaffle : IWaffle {
    public string Eat() { return "Eating a Falafel Waffle"; }
    public string Dinner() { return "Having dinner with a Falafel Waffle"; }
}
public class HugePlate : IPlate<BelgiumWaffle> {
    // This extra method is needed due the lack of the 'out' on the definition
    public IWaffle GetWaffle() { return GetMyWaffle(); }
    public BelgiumWaffle GetMyWaffle() { return new BelgiumWaffle(); }
}
public class SmallPlate : IPlate<FalafelWaffle> {
    // This extra method is needed due the lack of the 'out' on the definition
    public IWaffle GetWaffle() { return GetMyWaffle(); }
    public FalafelWaffle GetMyWaffle() { return new FalafelWaffle(); }
}

class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        // The list cannot work with the IPlate<IWaffle> anymore. So here comes IPlateNG to the rescue
        var plates = new List<IPlateNG>();
        plates.Add(new HugePlate());
        plates.Add(new SmallPlate());

        IPlateNG aPlate = plates[0];
        // And instead of calling to the GetMyWaffle method we can call to the GetWaffle in this case
        IWaffle aWaffle = aPlate.GetWaffle();
        Console.WriteLine(aWaffle.Eat());

        IPlate<FalafelWaffle> aSmallPlate = (SmallPlate)plates[1];
        FalafelWaffle aFalafel = aSmallPlate.GetMyWaffle();
        Console.WriteLine(aFalafel.Dinner());
    }
}

请注意，我必须在两个具体类上制作GetMyWaffle(named )的额外非泛型版本，以解决缺少“ out ”关键字的问题。但其余部分非常相似。GetWaffleIPlate

于 2012-10-25T16:23:21.077 回答
0

在 3.5 中工作，感谢@JakubKonecki 指出协方差

    public interface IWaffle { }
    public interface IPlate<out T> where T : IWaffle { }
    public interface IPancake : IWaffle { }

    public class BelgiumWaffle : IWaffle {}
    public class FalafelWaffle : IWaffle {}
    public class HugePlate : IPlate<BelgiumWaffle> {}
    public class SmallPlate : IPlate<FalafelWaffle> { }

    var plates = new List<IPlate<IWaffle>>();
    plates.Add(new HugePlate());
    plates.Add(new SmallPlate());
于 2012-10-25T14:12:39.670 回答
0

你可以使用抽象类而不是 T 的接口吗？

public abstract class Waffle { }
public interface IPlate<T> where T : Waffle
{
    T Food
    {
        get;
        set;
    }
}

public class BelgiumWaffle : Waffle { }
public class FalafelWaffle : Waffle { }
public class HugePlate<T> : IPlate<T> where T : Waffle
{
    public HugePlate(T food)
    {
        this.Food = food;
    }

    public T Food
    {
        get;
        set;
    }
}

public class SmallPlate<T> : IPlate<T> where T : Waffle
{
    public SmallPlate(T food)
    {
        this.Food = food;
    }

    public T Food
    {
        get;
        set;
    }
}

public class Test
{
    Test()
    {
        var platesOfWaffle = new List<IPlate<Waffle>>();
        platesOfWaffle.Add(new HugePlate<Waffle>(new BelgiumWaffle()));
        platesOfWaffle.Add(new SmallPlate<Waffle>(new FalafelWaffle()));
    }
}
于 2012-10-25T15:17:48.810 回答