即,两者之间有什么区别
subrange(V, 0, 3);
和
project(V, range(0,3));
?
我问是因为我正在研究一些似乎同时使用两种形式的代码(一种与另一种没有明显的押韵/原因),但我看不出两者之间有任何区别......只是想检查一下确保我没有遗漏任何东西。
Looked into it, and I've confirmed there is no difference - subrange is simply an easy wrapper for a common-case of project, and in these cases:
subrange(V, 0, 3);
project(V, range(0,3));
...they end up identical. So using either should be fine, as long as you're consistent!
For the more curious... subrange does:
template<class V>
vector_range<V> subrange (V &data, typename V::size_type start, typename V::size_type stop) {
typedef basic_range<typename V::size_type, typename V::difference_type> range_type;
return vector_range<V> (data, range_type (start, stop));
}
while project does:
template<class V>
vector_range<V> project (V &data, typename vector_range<V>::range_type const &r) {
return vector_range<V> (data, r);
}
..and since vector_range::range_type is defined to be
typedef basic_range<size_type, difference_type> range_type;
...ie, exactly what is used in subrange, the two forms are identical.