synchronized
似乎没有像我预期的那样工作。它不应该使括号内的代码相对于synchronized
同一对象的单独代码块具有原子性吗?
我发现它在我的代码中根本没有同步。
private Object movementMutex_ = new Object();
// Thread
public void run()
{
while (run_)
{
synchronized(movementMutex_)
{
if (timeToMove_)
{
Log.v("meh", "timeToMove_ was true, moving");
makeMove();
Log.v("meh", "Move Complete. Setting timeToMove_ to false");
timeToMove_ = false;
Log.v("meh", "timeToMove_ is now false");
}
}
}
}
// Called by a different thread so that this thread knows when to make a move
public void move()
{
Log.v("meh", "awaiting movementMutex in move()");
// Synchronizing so that timeToMove_ doesn't get set true while in the middle of moving and thus setting it back false prematurely
synchronized(movementMutex_)
{
Log.v("meh", "move called, setting timeToMove_");
timeToMove_ = true;
Log.v("meh", "timeToMove_ is now true");
}
}
查看日志打印输出,我看到它们以意外的顺序打印。根据我对同步的理解,粗体的语句应该不能被非粗体打印输出解释,但事实并非如此,而我正试图避免的事情正在发生:我错过了下一步,因为我设置了它当它仍然是真实的时候是真实的,并迅速将其变为虚假。
08-12 10:47:19.860: V/meh(27639): awaiting movementMutex in move()
08-12 10:47:19.985: V/meh(27639): move called, setting timeToMove_
08-12 10:47:19.985: V/meh(27639): timeToMove_ is now true
08-12 10:47:19.985: V/meh(27639): **timeToMove_ was true, moving**
08-12 10:47:20.352: V/meh(27639): awaiting movementMutex in move()
下一行应该是不可能的。它不是在等待运动互斥!
08-12 10:47:20.352: V/meh(27639): move called, setting timeToMove_
08-12 10:47:20.360: V/meh(27639): timeToMove_ is now true
08-12 10:47:20.360: V/meh(27639): **Move Complete. Setting timeToMove_ to false**
08-12 10:47:20.360: V/meh(27639): **timeToMove_ is now false**