我试图简化 AST 的创建，但收到一条奇怪的错误消息：
case class Box(i: Int)
object M {
import language.experimental.macros
import scala.reflect.makro.Context
case class meth(obj: String, method: String)(implicit val c: Context) {
import c.universe._
def apply(xs: Tree*) =
Apply(Select(Ident(obj), newTermName(method)), xs.toList)
}
def box(n: Int): Box = macro boxImpl
def boxImpl(c: Context)(n: c.Expr[Int]): c.Expr[Box] = {
import c.universe._
implicit val cc: c.type = c
n.tree match {
case arg @ Literal(Constant(_)) =>
meth("Box", "apply").apply(arg)
}
}
}
错误：
<console>:26: error: type mismatch;
found : c.universe.Literal
required: _2.c.universe.Tree where val _2: M.meth
possible cause: missing arguments for method or constructor
meth("Box", "apply").apply(arg)
^
是否可以将正确的类型推断到类中meth？或者是否有解决该问题的方法？
编辑：基于@retronyms 的回答，我得到了这个工作：
object M {
import language.experimental.macros
import scala.reflect.makro.Context
def meth(implicit c: Context) = new Meth[c.type](c)
class Meth[C <: Context](val c: C) {
import c.universe._
def apply(obj: String, method: String, xs: Tree*) =
Apply(Select(Ident(obj), newTermName(method)), xs.toList)
}
def box(n: Int): Box = macro boxImpl
def boxImpl(c: Context)(n: c.Expr[Int]): c.Expr[Box] = {
import c.universe._
implicit val cc: c.type = c
n.tree match {
case arg @ Literal(Constant(_)) =>
c.Expr(meth.apply("Box", "apply", arg))
}
}
}