我以前就这个话题发过帖子,但到目前为止我还没有多少运气。我把它归结为我的一个坏问题。这次我做了一个简短的可编译示例,显示了我试图避免的不良行为。我希望这是赞赏。
问题是两个(或更多)线程被设置为运行相同的进程,它们的“id”决定了它们操作的变量数据的哪一部分。目前两个线程都将更新计数器。
当前输出如下所示,
tid = 0, var[tid] = 0
tid = 0, var[tid] = 1
tid = 0, var[tid] = 2
tid = 0, var[tid] = 3
tid = 0, var[tid] = 4
tid = 0, var[tid] = 5
tid = 0, var[tid] = 6
tid = 0, var[tid] = 7
tid = 0, var[tid] = 8
tid = 0, var[tid] = 9
tid = 1, var[tid] = 0
Press any key to continue . . .
所需的输出应该是这样的......
tid = 0, var[tid] = 0
tid = 1, var[tid] = 0
tid = 0, var[tid] = 1
tid = 1, var[tid] = 1
tid = 0, var[tid] = 2
tid = 1, var[tid] = 2
tid = 0, var[tid] = 3
tid = 1, var[tid] = 3 etc.
此处的任何指导将不胜感激。
编辑:我已经使用按预期工作的代码更新了答案。
【注意这里效率很重要,我想尽快完成流程】
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/thread.hpp>
int var[2];
int mT;
int mTotalSamples;
boost::mutex mCountMutex;
boost::thread *threadMap[2];
using namespace std;
void process()
{
int tid = 1;
// sleep for 1 seconds - just to make sure threadMap
// has been assigned (only ncessary for this demo).
boost::this_thread::sleep(boost::posix_time::seconds(1));
if (threadMap[0]->get_id() == boost::this_thread::get_id()){ tid = 0;}
while ( mT < mTotalSamples )
{
// perform processing
var[tid] = mT;
// processing complete
mCountMutex.lock(); // (a thread waits to aquire mutex)
cout << "tid = " << tid << ", var[tid] = " << var[tid] << endl;
mT++; // How to stop both threads incrementing this?
mCountMutex.unlock();
}
}
int main()
{
boost::thread_group threads;
mT = 0;
mTotalSamples = 10;
threadMap[0] = threads.create_thread( boost::bind(&process) );
threadMap[1] = threads.create_thread( boost::bind(&process) );
threads.join_all();
return 0;
}