我正在稍微修改一个 sql server 2005 存储过程以提高性能,我想快速确保旧存储过程和新存储过程返回完全相同的结果(列相同,我想确保行是相同的)。
在 sql server 2005 中是否有一种简单的方法可以做到这一点?
我正在稍微修改一个 sql server 2005 存储过程以提高性能,我想快速确保旧存储过程和新存储过程返回完全相同的结果(列相同,我想确保行是相同的)。
在 sql server 2005 中是否有一种简单的方法可以做到这一点?
您可以使用 except 构造在两个查询之间进行匹配。
select * from (select * from query1) as query1
except
select * from (select * from query2) as query2
编辑:
然后逆向查询,找出以query2为驱动的差异:
select * from (select * from query2) as query2
except
select * from (select * from query1) as query1
下面的存储过程将比较 2 个存储过程或 2 个语句的输出结果集。这里的关键是SP不需要知道结果集的结构或模式,因此您可以任意测试任何SP。如果输出相同,它将返回 0 行。此解决方案在 SQL Server 中使用 openrowset 命令。这是存储过程的一些示例用法
DECLARE @SQL_SP1 VARCHAR(MAX)
DECLARE @SQL_SP2 VARCHAR(MAX)
-- Compare results of 2 Stored Procs
SET @SQL_SP1 = 'EXEC SomeDB.dbo.[usp_GetWithTheProgram_OLD] 100, ''SomeParamX'''
SET @SQL_SP1 = 'EXEC SomeDB.dbo.[usp_GetWithTheProgram_NEW] 50, ''SomeParamX'''
EXEC utlCompareStatementResults @SQL_SP1, @SQL_SP2
-- Compare just 2 SQL Statements
SET @SQL_SP1 = 'SELECT * FROM SomeDB.dbo.Table1 WHERE CreatedOn > ''2016-05-08'''
SET @SQL_SP1 = 'SELECT * FROM SomeDB.dbo.Table1 WHERE CreatedOn > ''2016-06-11'''
EXEC utlCompareStatementResults @SQL_SP1, @SQL_SP2
SP 需要以下先决条件,这对于生产环境可能并不理想,但对于本地 QA、DEV 和测试环境非常有用。它在代码中使用 openrowset。
EXEC sp_configure 'show advanced options', 1
EXEC sp_configure 'ad hoc distributed queries', 1
EXEC sp_serveroption @@SERVERNAME, 'DATA ACCESS', TRUE
这是存储过程的代码。
==================================================================================
--== SUMMARY utlCompareStatementResults
--== - requires sp_configure 'show advanced options', 1
--== - requires sp_configure 'ad hoc distributed queries', 1
--== - maybe requires EXEC sp_serveroption @@SERVERNAME, 'DATA ACCESS', TRUE
--== - requires the RecordSet Output to have Unique ColumnNames (no duplicate columns)
--== - requires references in straight SQL to be fully qualified [dbname].[schema].[objects] but not within an SP
--== - requires references SP call to be fully qualifed [dbname].[schema].[spname] but not objects with the SP
--== OUTPUT
--== Differences are returned
--== If there is no recordset returned, then theres no differences
--== However if you are comparing 2 empty recordsets, it doesn't mean anything
--== USAGE
--== DECLARE @SQL_SP1 VARCHAR(MAX)
--== DECLARE @SQL_SP2 VARCHAR(MAX)
--== -- Compare just 2 SQL Statements
--== SET @SQL_SP1 = 'SELECT * FROM SomeDB.dbo.Table1 WHERE CreatedOn > ''2016-05-08'''
--== SET @SQL_SP1 = 'SELECT * FROM SomeDB.dbo.Table1 WHERE CreatedOn > ''2016-06-11'''
--== EXEC utlCompareStatementResults @SQL_SP1, @SQL_SP2
--==
--== -- Compare results of 2 Stored Procs
--== SET @SQL_SP1 = 'EXEC SomeDB.dbo.[usp_GetWithTheProgram_OLD] 100, ''SomeParamX'''
--== SET @SQL_SP1 = 'EXEC SomeDB.dbo.[usp_GetWithTheProgram_NEW] 50, ''SomeParamX'''
--== EXEC utlCompareStatementResults @SQL_SP1, @SQL_SP2
--==================================================================================
CREATE PROCEDURE utlCompareStatementResults
@SQL_SP1 VARCHAR(MAX),
@SQL_SP2 VARCHAR(MAX)
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @TABLE1 VARCHAR(200)
DECLARE @TABLE2 VARCHAR(200)
DECLARE @SQL_OPENROWSET VARCHAR(MAX)
DECLARE @CONNECTION VARCHAR(100)
SET @CONNECTION = 'server='+@@SERVERNAME+';Trusted_Connection=yes'
SET @SQL_SP1 = REPLACE(@SQL_SP1, '''','''''')
SET @SQL_SP2 = REPLACE(@SQL_SP2, '''','''''')
SET @TABLE1 = '#' + SUBSTRING(CONVERT(VARCHAR(250),NEWID()), 1, 8)
SET @TABLE2 = '#' + SUBSTRING(CONVERT(VARCHAR(250),NEWID()), 1, 8)
SET @SQL_OPENROWSET =
'SELECT * ' + ' ' +
'INTO ' + @TABLE1 + ' ' +
'FROM OPENROWSET(''SQLNCLI'', ' + '''' + @CONNECTION + '''' +
',''' + @SQL_SP1 +'''); ' +
'SELECT * ' + ' ' +
'INTO ' + @TABLE2 + ' ' +
'FROM OPENROWSET(''SQLNCLI'', ' + '''' + @CONNECTION + '''' +
',''' + @SQL_SP2 +'''); ' +
'(SELECT * FROM ' + @TABLE1 + ' EXCEPT SELECT * FROM ' + @TABLE2 + ') ' +
' UNION ALL ' +
'(SELECT * FROM ' + @TABLE2 + ' EXCEPT SELECT * FROM ' + @TABLE1 + '); ' +
'DROP TABLE ' + @TABLE1 + '; ' +
'DROP TABLE ' + @TABLE2 + '; '
PRINT @SQL_OPENROWSET
EXEC (@SQL_OPENROWSET)
PRINT 'DifferenceCount: ' + CONVERT(VARCHAR(100), @@ROWCOUNT)
END
要完成@jabs的回答,您可以使用以下模板来获取两个查询之间的区别:
with q1 as (<INSERT_QUERY_1_HERE>)
, q2 as (<INSERT_QUERY_2_HERE>)
select * from q1 except select * from q2
union all (
select * from q2 except select * from q1);
示例 1:这将返回 0 行,因为查询是相同的
with q1 as (select * from my_table)
, q2 as (select * from my_table)
select * from q1 except select * from q2
union all (
select * from q2 except select * from q1);
示例 2:这将返回查询之间的不同行(其中foo = 'bar'
)
with q1 as (select * from my_table)
, q2 as (select * from my_table where foo <> 'bar')
select * from q1 except select * from q2
union all (
select * from q2 except select * from q1);
示例 3:为了好玩,您可以检查示例 2 中的查询是否与查询 where 的行相同foo = 'bar'
。
with q1 as (
with q1 as (select * from my_table)
, q2 as (select * from my_table where foo <> 'bar')
select * from q1 except select * from q2
union all (
select * from q2 except select * from q1)
)
, q2 as (select * from my_table where foo = 'bar')
select * from q1 except select * from q2
union all (
select * from q2 except select * from q1);
create table #OldProcResults (
<Blah>
)
create table #NewProcResults (
<Blih>
)
insert into #OldProcResults
exec MyOldProc
insert into #NewProcResults
exec MyNewProc
然后使用 Jabs 的答案来比较这两个表。
EXCEPT 是比较两个查询的关键(正如@jabs 所说)。
SELECT count(*), * FROM "query 1 here"
EXCEPT
SELECT count(*), * FROM "query 2 here"
为每个查询添加count(*)
以确保两者具有相同的结果。以防万一有一些重复的行被除外删除。
创建两个临时表,每个过程一个。运行该过程以将行插入到相应的表中。
然后从一个中选择 * 减去从另一个中选择 * 反之亦然
这里有一些更详细的方法可以帮助我在 MSSQL 上研究这个问题。@tpvasconcelos 的答案是迄今为止最正确的。
DECLARE @AAA TABLE(id bigint NOT NULL)
INSERT INTO @AAA
VALUES (1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6),(7)
DECLARE @bbb TABLE(id bigint NOT NULL)
INSERT INTO @bbb
VALUES (1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6),(7)
Declare @diff int = (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM (SELECT * FROM @AAA EXCEPT SELECT * FROM @bbb) AS TB)
Declare @aux1 int;
set @aux1 = (select count(*) from @BBB);
Declare @aux2 int;
set @aux2 = (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM @AAA)
Declare @aux3 int;
set @aux3 = (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM (select * from @AAA union SELECT * FROM @bbb) as tb); -- for union to work it needs a alias
IF @diff <> 0
begin
PRINT 'Flow @flows_name has failed.'
end
else
begin
IF @aux1 = @aux3
begin
PRINT 'Flow @flows_name might have SUCCEEDED!'
end
else
begin
PRINT 'Flow @flows_name has failed.'
end
end