我正在尝试使用 weka 的 java api 创建一个“自动训练”,但我想我做错了什么,每当我使用 MultiLayerPerceptron 和 10 交叉验证或 66% 百分比拆分通过 weka 的界面测试我的 ARFF 文件时,我都会得到一些令人满意的结果(大约 90%),但是当我尝试通过 weka 的 API 测试同一个文件时,每个测试基本上都返回 0% 匹配(每一行都返回 false)
这是 weka 的 gui 的输出:
=== 测试拆分评估 === === 总结 ===
Correctly Classified Instances 78 91.7647 %
Incorrectly Classified Instances 7 8.2353 %
Kappa statistic 0.8081
Mean absolute error 0.0817
Root mean squared error 0.24
Relative absolute error 17.742 %
Root relative squared error 51.0603 %
Total Number of Instances 85
=== 按等级划分的详细准确度 ===
TP Rate FP Rate Precision Recall F-Measure ROC Area Class
0.885 0.068 0.852 0.885 0.868 0.958 1
0.932 0.115 0.948 0.932 0.94 0.958 0
Weighted Avg. 0.918 0.101 0.919 0.918 0.918 0.958
=== 混淆矩阵 ===
a b <-- classified as
23 3 | a = 1
4 55 | b = 0
这是我在java上使用的代码(实际上是在.NET上使用IKVM):
var classifier = new weka.classifiers.functions.MultilayerPerceptron();
classifier.setOptions(weka.core.Utils.splitOptions("-L 0.7 -M 0.3 -N 75 -V 0 -S 0 -E 20 -H a")); //these are the same options (the default options) when the test is run under weka gui
string trainingFile = Properties.Settings.Default.WekaTrainingFile; //the path to the same file I use to test on weka explorer
weka.core.Instances data = null;
data = new weka.core.Instances(new java.io.BufferedReader(new java.io.FileReader(trainingFile))); //loads the file
data.setClassIndex(data.numAttributes() - 1); //set the last column as the class attribute
cl.buildClassifier(data);
var tmp = System.IO.Path.GetTempFileName(); //creates a temp file to create an arff file with a single row with the instance I want to test taken from the arff file loaded previously
using (var f = System.IO.File.CreateText(tmp))
{
//long code to read data from db and regenerate the line, simulating data coming from the source I really want to test
}
var dataToTest = new weka.core.Instances(new java.io.BufferedReader(new java.io.FileReader(tmp)));
dataToTest.setClassIndex(dataToTest.numAttributes() - 1);
double prediction = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < dataToTest.numInstances(); i++)
{
weka.core.Instance curr = dataToTest.instance(i);
weka.core.Instance inst = new weka.core.Instance(data.numAttributes());
inst.setDataset(data);
for (int n = 0; n < data.numAttributes(); n++)
{
weka.core.Attribute att = dataToTest.attribute(data.attribute(n).name());
if (att != null)
{
if (att.isNominal())
{
if ((data.attribute(n).numValues() > 0) && (att.numValues() > 0))
{
String label = curr.stringValue(att);
int index = data.attribute(n).indexOfValue(label);
if (index != -1)
inst.setValue(n, index);
}
}
else if (att.isNumeric())
{
inst.setValue(n, curr.value(att));
}
else
{
throw new InvalidOperationException("Unhandled attribute type!");
}
}
}
prediction += cl.classifyInstance(inst);
}
//prediction is always 0 here, my ARFF file has two classes: 0 and 1, 92 zeroes and 159 ones
这很有趣,因为如果我将分类器更改为让我们说 NaiveBayes,结果与通过 weka 的 gui 进行的测试相匹配