我想说一种纯粹的功能方式是使用一种可以保持有效和错误状态的类型。
为此,您可以使用验证表单 scalaz
但是,如果不需要更多来自 scalaz 的内容(您将 ^^),您可以使用一个非常简单的东西,使用 aPromise[Either[String, Ingredient]]
作为结果及其fold
在 Async 块中的方法。也就是说,map
在兑现承诺时和兑现的东西上转换价值fold
。
好点 => 没有例外 => 每件事都是输入检查:-)
编辑
它可能需要更多信息,这里有两个选项:try catch,感谢@kheraud)和 Either。没放Validation
,有需要的问我。对象应用扩展控制器{
def index = Action {
Ok(views.html.index("Your new application is ready."))
}
//Using Try Catch
// What was missing was the wrapping of the BadRequest into a Promise since the Async
// is requiring such result. That's done using Promise.pure
def test1 = Async {
try {
val created = Promise.pure(new {val name:String = "myname"})
created map { stuff =>
Redirect(routes.Application.index()).flashing("success" -> "Stuff '%s' show".format(stuff.name))
}
} catch {
case _ => {
Promise.pure(Redirect(routes.Application.index()).flashing("error" -> "an error occurred man"))
}
}
}
//Using Either (kind of Validation)
// on the Left side => a success value with a name
val success = Left(new {val name:String = "myname"})
// on the Right side the exception message (could be an Exception instance however => to keep the stack)
val fail = Right("Bang bang!")
// How to use that
// I simulate your service using Promise.pure that wraps the Either result
// so the return type of service should be Promise[Either[{val name:String}, String]] in this exemple
// Then while mapping (that is create a Promise around the convert content), we folds to create the right Result (Redirect in this case).
// the good point => completely compiled time checked ! and no wrapping with pure for the error case.
def test2(trySuccess:Boolean) = Async {
val created = Promise.pure(if (trySuccess) success else fail)
created map { stuff /* the either */ =>
stuff.fold(
/*success case*/s => Redirect(routes.Application.index()).flashing("success" -> "Stuff '%s' show".format(s.name)),
/*the error case*/f => Redirect(routes.Application.index()).flashing("error" -> f)
)
}
}
}