当你调用expires_from_now()
一个正在运行的定时器时,定时器被取消,并调用一个新的定时器。因此调用关联的处理程序。在处理程序中很容易区分取消的计时器和过期的计时器。然而,我想知道,是否有办法区分过期和重新触发的计时器。在这两种情况下,处理程序都使用 error_code 调用operation_aborted
。或者我可能遗漏了一些细节。
下面的代码生成以下输出:
20120415 21:32:28079507 Main: Timer1 set to 15 s.
20120415 21:32:28079798 Main: Timer1 set to 12 s.
20120415 21:32:28079916 Handler1: Timer 1 was cancelled or retriggered.
20120415 21:32:40079860 Handler1: expired.
这表明处理程序无法为取消的处理程序实现操作,因为重新触发计时器将调用相同的处理程序并因此执行相同的操作。这可能不是预期的行为。
#include <boost/asio.hpp>
#include <boost/thread.hpp>
#include <boost/date_time/posix_time/posix_time.hpp>
#include <boost/date_time/posix_time/posix_time_io.hpp>
#include <iostream>
using namespace boost::posix_time;
using namespace std;
void handler1(const boost::system::error_code &ec)
{
if (ec == boost::asio::error::operation_aborted)
{
cout << microsec_clock::local_time() << " Handler1: Timer was cancelled or retriggered." << endl;
}
else
{
cout << microsec_clock::local_time() << " Handler1: Timer expired." << endl;
}
}
boost::asio::io_service io_service1;
void run1()
{
io_service1.run();
}
int main()
{
time_facet *facet = new time_facet("%Y%m%d %H:%M:%S%f");
cout.imbue(locale(cout.getloc(), facet));
boost::asio::deadline_timer timer1(io_service1, seconds(15));
timer1.async_wait(handler1);
cout << microsec_clock::local_time() << " Main: Timer1 set to 15 s." << endl;
// now actually run the timer
boost::thread thread1(run1);
timer1.expires_from_now(seconds(12));
cout << microsec_clock::local_time() << " Main: Timer1 set to 12 s." << endl;
// here the timer is running, but we need to reset the deadline
timer1.async_wait(handler1);
thread1.join(); // wait for thread1 to terminate
}